Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
osu1058798180.pdf (734.54 KB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
Local resolution for watershed management: the case of water and land allocation of Cotacachi, Ecuador
Author Info
Rodriguez, Fabian Francisco
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1058798180
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2003, Doctor of Philosophy, Ohio State University, Natural Resources.
Abstract
Various environmental trade-offs arise in the Cotacachi watershed, located in the Andes Mountains north of Quito, Ecuador. Of particular concern to the local population are the declining quality and diminished reliability of water supplies for household and agricultural uses resulting from deforestation, poor pasture management, and related problems in the upper reaches of the drainage basin. The purpose of this study is to determine what, if anything, local people are willing to pay for the sort of watershed management that would make water supplies cleaner and less subject to interruption, and to estimate the shadow price of irrigation water for the efficient allocation of resources. Estimates of willingness-to-pay (WTP) were obtained using contingent valuation (CV), and estimates of the shadow price were obtained using a Linear Programming model (LP). Eighty households were interviewed in September 2002. Half these households are in communities below 3,200 meters elevation, which have irrigation, and the other half in communities above this elevation level, where agriculture is rain-fed. Along with questions relating to economic activities and income sources, which yielded data for the development of the LP model, the survey instrument contained referendum-style CV questions. Using the responses to CV questions, I estimated an econometric model in which WTP for water quantity and quality improvements was the dependent variable and right-hand side variables included household earnings and the portion of income derived from off-farm employment. The LP model yielded the shadow price of water: $0.27 per cubic meter of water in low-altitude communities and $0.26 per cubic meter of water in high-altitude settings. Econometric revealed that the majority of households, in low-altitude communities as well as high-altitude settings, are willing to pay between $1 to $3 per month (avg. 1.94) to make water supplies cleaner and more reliable – through improved watershed management, for example. This is a sizable payment relative to existing tariffs for potable and irrigation water. This study suggests that the costs of watershed management could be covered, at least in part, by capturing the local benefits of same. This has significant implications for the decentralization of water resource development in Ecuador.
Committee
Douglas Southgate (Advisor)
Pages
182 p.
Subject Headings
Economics, Agricultural
Keywords
watershed management
;
public policy
;
economics
;
Ecuador
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Rodriguez, F. F. (2003).
Local resolution for watershed management: the case of water and land allocation of Cotacachi, Ecuador
[Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1058798180
APA Style (7th edition)
Rodriguez, Fabian.
Local resolution for watershed management: the case of water and land allocation of Cotacachi, Ecuador.
2003. Ohio State University, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1058798180.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Rodriguez, Fabian. "Local resolution for watershed management: the case of water and land allocation of Cotacachi, Ecuador." Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 2003. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1058798180
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
osu1058798180
Download Count:
2,720
Copyright Info
© 2003, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by The Ohio State University and OhioLINK.