Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


osu1127144350.pdf (36.05 MB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Between city and suburb: the near urban neighborhood, technology, and the commodification of the American house, 1914-1934

Hitch, Neal V
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1127144350

Abstract Details

2005, Doctor of Philosophy, Ohio State University, History.
This work offers a new perspective on the standard interpretation of suburbanization in the United States and provides a historical model within the literature of New Urbanism. The work investigates aspects of both the community and commodity of the “modern” home and what I refer to as the near urban neighborhood. During the early decades of the twentieth century, there was a fundamental change in the nature of housing in the United States. This change resulted in a new residential streets developed to be both automobile- and pedestrian-friendly; a new floor plan, what I refer to as a box for technology; and the commodification of the American home, equated with items such as the radio and automobile. The house itself, as it exists today, is a record of this change. In this study, architectural archaeology and an in depth investigation of one street in Columbus, Ohio, were used to gain historical insight about why the house changed. This study of eight primary artifacts (houses) was augmented by trade journals, plan books, and ladies’ magazines to show how the new house plan of the 1920s became standardized across the United States. These investigations showed that by the 1920s: 1. The house sat on a street. The street connected the house to services, often technological. And the neighborhood connected the house to community; 2. The house was a box for technology holding the appliances and artifacts connected to the systems on the street; 3. The box consisted of a series of rooms, each with its own technological appliances and devices; 4. Emergent middle-class families bought these homes. Evidence suggested that changes in technology became the common thread in the development of the new house type. The technological change within the near urban home was not a slow, progressive transition. The change was fast and revolutionary. By purchasing a near urban home, the homeowner bought and embraced the entire package of twentieth-century technology and culture. The home had become “modern” in both its plan and conception. And, builders and owners tied the idea of the “modern” home directly to the technology within.
John Burnham (Advisor)
356 p.
Architecture; Housing; Consumer Culture; Neighborhood; Community; Technology; Urban History; Planning; New Urbanism

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Hitch, N. V. (2005). Between city and suburb: the near urban neighborhood, technology, and the commodification of the American house, 1914-1934 [Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1127144350

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Hitch, Neal. Between city and suburb: the near urban neighborhood, technology, and the commodification of the American house, 1914-1934. 2005. Ohio State University, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1127144350.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Hitch, Neal. "Between city and suburb: the near urban neighborhood, technology, and the commodification of the American house, 1914-1934." Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 2005. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1127144350

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

osu1127144350
557
© 2005, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by The Ohio State University and OhioLINK.