Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


RankinT_dis (final comments 2).pdf (1.42 MB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Comparing the Utility and Reliability of Two Current Suicide-Related Nomenclatures

Rankin, Thomas James
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=akron1365533457

Abstract Details

2013, Doctor of Philosophy, University of Akron, Counseling Psychology.
This dissertation examined the reliability and perceived clinical utility of two current suicide-related nomenclatures. The language of suicidology has been confusing for the past half-century, thereby inhibiting effective study of the problem of suicide. This dissertation’s survey research compared two nomenclatures: the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA; Posner, Oquendo, Gould, Stanley, & Davies, 2007) and the Silverman nomenclature (Silverman, Berman, Sanddal, O’Carroll, & Joiner, 2007a and 2007b). Hypothetical vignettes were constructed to represent the different terms and definitions of each of the two nomenclatures; ten vignettes were randomly selected to be presented to participants. The 131 participants were mental health clinicians who were currently seeing clients for at least five hours per week. The hypotheses were that the C-CASA would exhibit better reliability and significantly better perceived clinical utility than the Silverman nomenclature. Perceived clinical utility was measured by a new 13-item questionnaire constructed for the purposes of this study. An exploratory factor analysis indicated that the perceived clinical utility questionnaire had a stable one-factor structure and an alpha of 0.95. The data supported both hypotheses. C-CASA’s reliability, as measured by kappa statistics, was 0.59, while the Silverman nomenclature’s was 0.45; this was more than a 0.1 difference in C-CASA’s favor. On the 7-point Likert-type scale of the perceived clinical utility questionnaire, the Silverman nomenclature received positive scores that were a bit above neutral (4.62), while the C-CASA received scores almost a point higher (5.43), which were almost halfway between “neutral” (4) and “strongly agree” (7). These differences were statistically significant and represented a large effect size (Cohen’s d was 0.83). These differences suggested that the C-CASA was preferable to the Silverman nomenclature, both in terms of reliability and perceived clinical utility. If replicated by other researchers, this result would mean that the C-CASA showed more promise than the Silverman nomenclature for constructing a common language for suicide-related thoughts and behaviors among practicing clinicians.
Ronald Levant, Dr. (Advisor)
Philip Allen, Dr. (Committee Member)
Dawn Johnson, Dr. (Committee Member)
John Queener, Dr. (Committee Member)
Ingrid Weigold, Dr. (Committee Member)
158 p.
Clinical Psychology; Counseling Psychology; Psychological Tests; Psychology; Psychotherapy
suicide; nomenclature; language; C-CASA; Silverman; vignette; clinical utility; reliability; clinicians; PCUQ; EFA; kappa; perceived clinical utility questionnaire; suicidology; suicide-related; common language;

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Rankin, T. J. (2013). Comparing the Utility and Reliability of Two Current Suicide-Related Nomenclatures [Doctoral dissertation, University of Akron]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=akron1365533457

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Rankin, Thomas. Comparing the Utility and Reliability of Two Current Suicide-Related Nomenclatures. 2013. University of Akron, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=akron1365533457.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Rankin, Thomas. "Comparing the Utility and Reliability of Two Current Suicide-Related Nomenclatures." Doctoral dissertation, University of Akron, 2013. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=akron1365533457

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

akron1365533457
581
© 2013, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by University of Akron and OhioLINK.