Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
bgsu1142895795.pdf (1.09 MB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
In Defense of an Animal’s Right to Life
Author Info
Simmons, Aaron
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1142895795
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2006, Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Bowling Green State University, Philosophy, Applied.
Abstract
In this dissertation, my primary aim is to defend the idea that animals have a basic moral right to life, such that we have a strong duty to refrain from killing them. More specifically, I argue that animals’ right to life is equal in strength to humans’ right to life, such that our duty not to kill animals is just as strong as our duty not to kill humans. An implication of this right is that we are required to cease killing animals for food, material, and purposes of scientific experimentation. I approach my thesis by examining two main objections to the view that animals have an equal right to life. The first objection contends that animals do not have a right to life because they do not have an interest to live. According to this objection, animals have no interest to live either (1) because having interests requires having desires and animals cannot have desires, or (2) because even if animals can have desires and interests, they do not have specifically an interest to live. In response, I argue, first, that many animals are in fact capable of having desires. Second, I argue that many animals do have specifically an interest to live. The second objection contends that animals do not have an equal right to life because life has less value for animals than humans. According to this objection, life has greater value for humans than animals because human life is richer than animal life, and this is the case because only humans possess traits such as autonomy, personhood, or rational agency. In response to this objection, I concede that it is plausible to think that life typically has greater value for humans than animals. However, I argue that having an equal right to life does not require that life has equal value for a being but rather just that the value of life for a being meets a certain threshold. I aim to show that the value of life for many animals meets this threshold.
Committee
Raymond Frey (Advisor)
Subject Headings
Philosophy
Keywords
RIGHT TO LIFE
;
marginal humans
;
interest to live
;
Animal Rights
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Simmons, A. (2006).
In Defense of an Animal’s Right to Life
[Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1142895795
APA Style (7th edition)
Simmons, Aaron.
In Defense of an Animal’s Right to Life.
2006. Bowling Green State University, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1142895795.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Simmons, Aaron. "In Defense of an Animal’s Right to Life." Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, 2006. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1142895795
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
bgsu1142895795
Download Count:
7,275
Copyright Info
© 2006, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Bowling Green State University and OhioLINK.