Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
bgsu1180034821.pdf (1.99 MB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
Immigrant Anxieties: 1990s Immigration Reform and The Neoliberal Consensus
Author Info
Gerken, Christina
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1180034821
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2007, Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Bowling Green State University, American Culture Studies/Ethnic Studies.
Abstract
Immigrant Anxieties: 1990s Immigration Reform and the Neoliberal Consensus concentrates on the discursive intersections between immigration, anti-terrorism, and welfare reform that developed in the mid-1990s debates over immigration reform in the United States. Drawing on Michel Foucault’s work, this project analyzes the discursive strategies that created, shaped, and upheld a race-specific image of a “desirable” immigrant. I argue that government debates, media discourse, and public perception were part of a larger regime of knowledge/power that continually produced and reinforced the neoliberal ideal of a responsible, self-sufficient subject. This underlying neoliberal logic with its reductionist insistence on cost-benefit analysis foreclosed any attempt to engage in a serious moral/ethical debate about the merits and effects of the U.S. immigration system. At the same time, my research demonstrates that despite this foreclosure of the terms of debate, the mid-1990s discourse on immigration was characterized by a productive tension between its underlying neoliberal assumptions and other often contradictory values and objectives. In addition, I interrogate how long-standing and deep-seated anxieties about immigrants’ race, class, gender, and sexuality intersected with neoliberal logic in both the public discourse and the legislative process. My dissertation examines congressional debates and mainstream newspapers to illustrate how immigration discourse circulates and how these distinct discursive sites work intertextually within the larger discourse to reinforce, supplement, and even contradict each other. Chapter 3 examines the neoliberal logic behind the restructuring of the family preference category to show how Congress used an explicit pro-family rhetoric to justify measures intended to activate legal immigrants’ capacity for self-sufficient citizenship. Chapter 4 interrogates the discursive construction of “illegal aliens” as “anti-citizens.” Chapter 5 explores the linkages between media and legislative discourse. Chapter 6 focuses on the mainstream media’s use of human interest stories, demonstrating how these stories served as an important tool to negotiate widespread anxieties about immigrants’ race, class, and sexuality.
Committee
Robert Buffington (Advisor)
Keywords
Immigration Reform
;
Neoliberalism
;
Race
;
Gender
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Gerken, C. (2007).
Immigrant Anxieties: 1990s Immigration Reform and The Neoliberal Consensus
[Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1180034821
APA Style (7th edition)
Gerken, Christina.
Immigrant Anxieties: 1990s Immigration Reform and The Neoliberal Consensus.
2007. Bowling Green State University, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1180034821.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Gerken, Christina. "Immigrant Anxieties: 1990s Immigration Reform and The Neoliberal Consensus." Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, 2007. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1180034821
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
bgsu1180034821
Download Count:
3,607
Copyright Info
© 2007, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Bowling Green State University and OhioLINK.