Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
bgsu1181165177.pdf (8.62 MB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
The Authority of Morality
Author Info
Milliken, John Robert
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1181165177
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2007, Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Bowling Green State University, Philosophy.
Abstract
A generally recognized feature of morality, discovered through experience, is that it makes demands on us, requiring us to do or not do certain things. It thus seems to have authority. A distinctive feature of this kind of demand is its independence of the agent’s own ends or desires. If an authority commands you to do x, you are required to do it, end of story. A way to describe this feature is inescapability, indicating these requirements apply to you in a way you cannot escape. Another distinctive feature of morality’s demands is their weightiness. They are supposed to be such that we always have most reason to comply with them. This alleged property is the overridingness of morality. Thus, in virtue of its authority, morality is thought to be both inescapable and overriding. In a well-known essay, G.E.M. Anscombe argues the only viable way to account for this kind of authority is to appeal to God. Is there another possibility? One is to say we do not need an authority; morality can be inescapable and overriding without one. I consider virtue ethics as a view Anscombe herself thought managed without the idea of an authority, but conclude it cannot ground either inescapability or overridingness. Another option is to say we may need an authority, but it need not be God. Inescapability and overridingness can arise from reason, or autonomy, or societal demands. All these strategies fail, however, vindicating Anscombe’s contention. The options for us are either some form of divine command ethics or an abandonment of the thought that morality is inescapable and overriding. Put this way, we may think our only real option is to give up inescapability and overridingness. It is widely thought there are insurmountable difficulties with the idea that morality can depend upon God. After showing a nuanced understanding of divine command ethics can avoid them, I conclude it is at least a conceptually satisfying way to account for inescapability and overridingness. The ultimate conclusion is that divine command ethics or the abandonment of the two features are the most plausible ways forward.
Committee
Raymond Frey (Advisor)
Pages
180 p.
Subject Headings
Philosophy
Keywords
authority
;
morality
;
ethics
;
inescapability
;
overridingness
;
anscombe
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Milliken, J. R. (2007).
The Authority of Morality
[Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1181165177
APA Style (7th edition)
Milliken, John.
The Authority of Morality.
2007. Bowling Green State University, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1181165177.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Milliken, John. "The Authority of Morality." Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, 2007. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1181165177
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
bgsu1181165177
Download Count:
2,435
Copyright Info
© 2007, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Bowling Green State University and OhioLINK.