Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


bgsu1225154800.pdf (323.97 KB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Motivated Stereotyping of Women: Sources of Justification for Derogating Female Therapists

Barnhart Miller, Amy Michelle
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1225154800

Abstract Details

2008, Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Bowling Green State University, Psychology/Clinical.
Previous research (Sinclair and Kunda, 2000) suggests that students and employees may rate female professors and managers who deliver negative feedback more negatively than their male counterparts. This finding is thought to result from participants’ applying the stereotype that women are less competent than men to protect their threatened self-esteem. In the current research, I examined the potential for motivated stereotyping of women to occur within the context of psychological therapy. I expected female, more than male, therapists (portrayed through typed stimulus materials and a photograph) to be derogated by participants after providing negative feedback because doing so: a) activates participants' motivation to protect their self-esteem, b) allows for use of readily available negative stereotypes about women, and c) violates the expectation that females will be kind. However, negative feedback can be provided in a relatively kind manner and, therefore, not violate the female-gender-role expectation of kindness. Therefore, in the current research I varied the type of feedback (positive or negative) and the manner in which negative feedback (e.g., blunt, negative feedback or negative-but-kind feedback) was presented. In addition to the primary dependent variable of derogation, I also assessed stereotype activation in order to examine the aforementioned process thought to underlie the derogation of professional women who provide negative feedback. Using a role-play methodology, 176 undergraduate students were randomly assigned to one of six conditions within a 3 [Type of Feedback: (positive, blunt negative, negative-but-kind)] x 2 [Sex of Therapist: (male, female)] between-subjects factorial design. Five hypotheses were proposed; partial support was found for 2 of the 5 hypotheses. To the extent that the methodology allowed for a clear test of these hypotheses, it is possible that the role of psychotherapist may represent a context to which previously proposed theory and results do not apply. Thus, consistent with role congruity theory, females may avoid the previously documented patterns of motivated derogation within certain female-dominated professions (Eagly & Karau, 2002).
Anne Gordon, Ph.D. (Committee Chair)
Scott Highhouse, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Carlton Rockett, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Annette Mahoney, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
106 p.
Psychology
Motivated Stereotyping; Role Congruity Theory; Women; Psychotherapist

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Barnhart Miller, A. M. (2008). Motivated Stereotyping of Women: Sources of Justification for Derogating Female Therapists [Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1225154800

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Barnhart Miller, Amy. Motivated Stereotyping of Women: Sources of Justification for Derogating Female Therapists. 2008. Bowling Green State University, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1225154800.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Barnhart Miller, Amy. "Motivated Stereotyping of Women: Sources of Justification for Derogating Female Therapists." Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, 2008. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1225154800

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

bgsu1225154800
671
© 2008, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Bowling Green State University and OhioLINK.