Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


bgsu1320804764.pdf (53.38 MB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Silence as a Rhetor's Tool: Rhetorical Choices for and uses of Silence

Aiken, Suzan E.
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1320804764

Abstract Details

2011, Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Bowling Green State University, English (Rhetoric and Writing).
Historically, the field of Rhetoric and Composition has participated in little or no investigation of rhetorical silence. Previous scholarship suggests silence as a form of oppressed or suppressed voices and silence as a negative action; however, this dissertation investigates the positive, productive aspects of silence. The study posits that silence can be intentionally utilized as a rhetorical tool, and investigates possible connections between rhetorical silence and rhetorical amplification. The dissertation first reviews available scholarship and organizes a heuristic with which rhetorical silence may be analyzed; and, second, applies the heuristic to two case studies of historic women rhetors who employ silence. Three heuristic categories of invention, delivery, and audience are developed as a means of organizing the focus and direction of the study. The heuristics are applied to two case studies, historical figures Anne Askew and Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, as a means of contributing theory and evidence to emerging field-wide discussions of rhetorical silence. Findings suggest that silence was intentionally used by both case studies; however, each rhetor used silence in unique ways. This study is anchored in the scholarship of scholars such as Lauer, Ede, Lundsford, Saville-Troike, Bruneau, and Burke, and extends the contemporary study of rhetorical silence by scholars such as Cheryl Glenn. Conclusions of the research confirm that silence can be intentionally used by a rhetor, and can be positive and productive. The study contributes new findings to the field by revealing the connections between rhetorical silence and rhetorical amplification, especially when the rhetor relies on the audience to supply their own meaning. Similarly, this study contributes a methodology for analyzing rhetorical silences. Implications demonstrate the usefulness of feminist methodologies and methods, that silence can be positive and productive, and that silence can be wielded as a rhetorical strategy; additional research will develop ongoing concepts and analysis with regard to rhetorical silence. The heuristics I designed can be applied to study rhetorical silences in other contexts in contemporary settings. Further, silence relies on a dynamic interplay between rhetor, audience, and context for delivery, reception, interpretation, and meaning.
Sue Carter Wood (Committee Chair)
Kristine Blair (Committee Member)
Christian Coons (Committee Member)
Lance Massey (Committee Member)
236 p.
Rhetoric
rhetoric; silence; amplification; audience; delivery; invention

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Aiken, S. E. (2011). Silence as a Rhetor's Tool: Rhetorical Choices for and uses of Silence [Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1320804764

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Aiken, Suzan. Silence as a Rhetor's Tool: Rhetorical Choices for and uses of Silence. 2011. Bowling Green State University, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1320804764.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Aiken, Suzan. "Silence as a Rhetor's Tool: Rhetorical Choices for and uses of Silence." Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, 2011. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1320804764

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

bgsu1320804764
6,164
© 2011, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Bowling Green State University and OhioLINK.