Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
ward diss 5.pdf (574.46 KB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
Against Natural Teleology and its Application in Ethical Theory
Author Info
Ward, Arthur S.
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1357563361
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2013, Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Bowling Green State University, Philosophy, Applied.
Abstract
Many ethical theories depend on the existence of natural teleology as a source of normativity. Natural Teleology, the purposive goal-directedness of non-conscious biological processes, is also embraced to some degree by a majority of philosophers of biology who agree that the teleological concepts of purpose, goal, defect, proper function and malfunction are legitimate, perhaps necessary, in biological explanations. In my dissertation I provide a substantive argument against the reduction of teleology to natural facts and argue that ethical theories that rely on it cannot be naturalistic. Several ethical theories could be my target, but I focus on the most overt example: neo-Aristotelian ethics. The project is in two sections, one in ethical theory and the other in philosophy of biology. In the first section of the dissertation, primarily using Philippa Foot and Judith Jarvis Thomson as models, I illustrate how Neo-Aristotelian theories rest on natural teleology. I offer a metaethical analysis of teleology, arguing that it does not belong to the good nor the right nor mere description, but rather the proper. I call this category of concept protonormativity. I claim that protonormativity, of which teleology is a paradigmatic example, does not yield normative facts and is not reducible to natural facts; it is a distinct conceptual category. In the second section I give a novel argument for why natural teleology cannot be reduced to natural facts. Teleological concepts such as design and proper function imply standards of correctness for phenotypic outcome. They entail norms for the way an item is to be in the end: functional or malfunctional, good or defective. However, since a phenotype is the result of a genotype in some set of environmental conditions, there can only be a proper phenotype if there exists a proper environment for the item to inhabit. Regarding artifacts, a designer is capable of setting a proper environment, but I argue science does not admit of proper environments for organisms in nature. The concept proper environment cannot be reduced to any set of natural facts. Therefore metaethical naturalists must abandon proper phenotypes, natural teleology, and ethical theories that rely on it.
Committee
Daniel Jacobson, PhD (Committee Chair)
William Mathis, PhD (Committee Member)
Michael Bradie, PhD (Committee Member)
Christian Coons, PhD (Committee Member)
John Basl, PhD (Committee Member)
Pages
96 p.
Subject Headings
Philosophy
Keywords
philosophy
;
ethics
;
metaethics
;
naturalism
;
human nature
;
aristotle
;
teleology
;
function
;
design
;
environment
;
proper
;
fittingness
;
malfunction
;
malfunctioning
;
neo-Aristotelian
;
flourishing
;
good
;
attributive good
;
predicative good
;
deontic
;
evaluative
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Ward, A. S. (2013).
Against Natural Teleology and its Application in Ethical Theory
[Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1357563361
APA Style (7th edition)
Ward, Arthur.
Against Natural Teleology and its Application in Ethical Theory.
2013. Bowling Green State University, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1357563361.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Ward, Arthur. "Against Natural Teleology and its Application in Ethical Theory." Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, 2013. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1357563361
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
bgsu1357563361
Download Count:
2,313
Copyright Info
© 2013, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Bowling Green State University and OhioLINK.