Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


Larry_Gibbs_FINAL_DISS.pdf (1.02 MB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Contraception Biographies: Women's Contraceptive Method Switching and Union Status

Gibbs, Larry
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1404313178

Abstract Details

2014, Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Bowling Green State University, Sociology.
American women, on average, are having only two children requiring the effective use of contraception for about 30 years. Relatively few women rely on the same type of contraception throughout their entire reproductive life course, meaning a large proportion tend to switch contraception. Prior research has not considered the contemporary context and has been largely limited to married women. This is problematic given shifts in reproductive behaviors of women along with changes in union formation in the United States. Using discrete-time event history analysis and drawing on data from the NSFG 2006-10, (N=12,279) I analyze three-year contraceptive switching behavior for single, cohabiting, and married women. Overall, 40% of women switch methods. While single, cohabiting and married women share similar risks of contraceptive method switching behavior, analyses distinguishing stable users and stable nonusers indicate that single women are more likely than married to switch contraception and also to remain as stable users of contraception relative to stable non-use. Given parity is a strong predictor of method switching, a set of analyses is limited to women at parity zero. However, the findings indicate that across union status, women at parity zero share similar risks contraceptive method switching. In terms of contraception used following switching, a greater proportion of cohabiting women switch to least effective methods, more single women switch to the pill and condom and married women switch to most effective methods. Results indicate that union status differs to an extent depending on the originating contraceptive method. Among initial pill users, cohabiting women compared to married women have lower odds of switching to most effective methods relative to least effective methods and cohabiting women who are initial least effective methods users, compared to married women, have lower risk of switching to most effective methods relative to condom. The results from this dissertation showcase the dynamics of contraceptive behavior and provide evidence that it is important to distinguish unmarried single and cohabiting women in the analysis of contraceptive switching behavior. Attention to contraceptive switching is important in research addressing the correlates and implications of intended and unintended pregnancies as well as studies of the meanings of cohabitation.
Wendy Manning, Ph.D. (Advisor)
Roudabeh Jamasbi, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Karen Guzzo, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Kara Joyner, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Monica Longmore, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
176 p.
Behavioral Sciences; Demography; Public Health; Sociology
contraception; contraceptive use; contraceptive method switching; reproductive health; union status; reproductive behavior

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Gibbs, L. (2014). Contraception Biographies: Women's Contraceptive Method Switching and Union Status [Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1404313178

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Gibbs, Larry. Contraception Biographies: Women's Contraceptive Method Switching and Union Status. 2014. Bowling Green State University, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1404313178.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Gibbs, Larry. "Contraception Biographies: Women's Contraceptive Method Switching and Union Status." Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, 2014. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1404313178

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

bgsu1404313178
1,707
© 2014, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Bowling Green State University and OhioLINK.