Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


FinalThesis_AbhishekSarkar.pdf (1.42 MB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

The Gambler's Fallacy and Hot Outcome: Cognitive Biases or Adaptive Thinking for Goalkeepers' Decisions on Dive Direction During Penalty Shootouts

Sarkar, Abhishek
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1483529030818181

Abstract Details

2017, Master of Education (MEd), Bowling Green State University, Human Movement, Sport and Leisure Studies /Sport Administration.
In the face of uncertainty, human judgment and decision-making often tends to deviate from the realm of rationality. Gambler’s fallacy and its opposite, hot outcome, are two such departures from laws of probability involving random streak of events. However, the adaptive thinking approach to decision-making proposes that any irrational heuristic or illogical belief can be fully adaptive as long as it fulfills the requirements of the decision task. During penalty shootouts in association football, goalkeepers face a series of multiple penalty kicks which are independent draws from a random process, and they need to anticipate the likely kick directions with limited time, insufficient information and computational capacity. The objective of this current study was to observe the goalkeepers in real-world competitive settings and examine whether they use gambler’s fallacy and hot outcome as predictive strategies to decide on their dive directions during penalty shootouts following streaks of correct and incorrect predictions in the same direction. Another goal was to investigate from the adaptive thinking perspective whether such strategies lead to more correct predictions by the goalkeepers. Penalty shootout data were collected from the elite soccer tournaments over the course of last 25 years (1992 - 2016) and after applying appropriate exclusion criterions, 405 penalty kicks were considered for the final analysis. Binomial tests revealed that following progressively longer streaks of correct predictions in the same direction, goalkeepers became increasingly more likely to dive in the opposite direction for the subsequent kick than would be expected by chance, a behavior consistent with gambler’s fallacy. However, neither gambler’s fallacy nor hot outcome type patterns were observed when analyzing dives of goalkeepers following streaks of incorrect predictions in a particular direction. On the other hand, results of the Fisher’s exact tests confirmed that both the fallacies failed to produce significantly more correct predictions from the goalkeepers and hence, they are mere fallacies. Goalkeepers’ belief in gambler’s fallacy highlights the biases associated with their real-world decision-making as this study does not support the adaptive use of such deceptive beliefs as predictive decision strategies.
David Tobar, PhD (Advisor)
Adrian Turner, PhD (Committee Member)
Matt Laurent, PhD (Committee Member)
58 p.
Behavioral Psychology; Behavioral Sciences; Cognitive Psychology; Kinesiology; Sports Management
Soccer; Penalty Shootouts; Decision making; Cognitive bias; Gamblers fallacy; Hot outcome; Heuristic; Adaptive thinking

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Sarkar, A. (2017). The Gambler's Fallacy and Hot Outcome: Cognitive Biases or Adaptive Thinking for Goalkeepers' Decisions on Dive Direction During Penalty Shootouts [Master's thesis, Bowling Green State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1483529030818181

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Sarkar, Abhishek. The Gambler's Fallacy and Hot Outcome: Cognitive Biases or Adaptive Thinking for Goalkeepers' Decisions on Dive Direction During Penalty Shootouts. 2017. Bowling Green State University, Master's thesis. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1483529030818181.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Sarkar, Abhishek. "The Gambler's Fallacy and Hot Outcome: Cognitive Biases or Adaptive Thinking for Goalkeepers' Decisions on Dive Direction During Penalty Shootouts." Master's thesis, Bowling Green State University, 2017. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1483529030818181

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

bgsu1483529030818181
2,897
© 2017, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Bowling Green State University and OhioLINK.