Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
ArnoldDissertation3.pdf (679.03 KB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
Inferred Statistics and Ecological Validity in Bayesian Reasoning
Author Info
Arnold, Christopher B
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1521816469920848
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2018, Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Bowling Green State University, Psychology.
Abstract
Research on Bayesian reasoning has indicated that people struggle with performance, usually providing non-normative responses. However, the problems used to assess Bayesian reasoning have been criticized on account of lacking ecological validity. In order to allow computation of a normative response, numerical information has been explicitly provided and responses have been shown to demonstrate base rate neglect. However, previous research has shown people to be highly attentive to base rates learned from experience (Nelson, Biernat, & Manis, 1990; Mastropasqua, Crupi, & Tentori, 2010). I hypothesize that performance is improved when the relationship between variables can be visualized. Although normative Bayesian judgment is determined using a mathematical formula, in most situations people make decisions without such explicit information and may develop effective heuristics for making likelihood judgments. The present study asked participants to make judgments using inferred base rate as well as inferred diagnostic information, a design which has not been used in any previous research. Because all of the statistics are inferred from experience it was expected that likelihood judgments would be made relatively intuitively and efficiently, avoiding base rate neglect and Bayesian conservativism. Performance on the inferred statistics problem was compared within-participants to performance on problems using natural frequencies and probabilities. Previous research has not compared performance in the same sample using inferred and explicit statistics. Contrary to my hypothesis, participants did not perform better when using inferred statistics than when using probabilities or natural frequencies. The present research implies that poor performance on Bayesian reasoning tasks is not the result of the way that information is presented or conflict between participants’ beliefs and provided statistics. Instead, it provides evidence that people are able to evaluate provided statistics in a way that is equivalent to judgments made using inferred statistics and that participants may use heuristics when provided with probabilities or natural frequencies. Although the results provided evidence for individual differences in Bayesian reasoning, numeracy did not predict performance.
Committee
Richard Anderson (Advisor)
Mary Hare (Committee Member)
Michael Zickar (Committee Member)
Tong Sun (Committee Member)
Pages
70 p.
Subject Headings
Psychology
Keywords
cognitive psychology
;
bayesian reasoning
;
heuristics
;
inferred statistics
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Arnold, C. B. (2018).
Inferred Statistics and Ecological Validity in Bayesian Reasoning
[Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1521816469920848
APA Style (7th edition)
Arnold, Christopher.
Inferred Statistics and Ecological Validity in Bayesian Reasoning.
2018. Bowling Green State University, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1521816469920848.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Arnold, Christopher. "Inferred Statistics and Ecological Validity in Bayesian Reasoning." Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, 2018. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1521816469920848
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
bgsu1521816469920848
Download Count:
328
Copyright Info
© 2018, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Bowling Green State University and OhioLINK.