Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
Full text release has been delayed at the author's request until May 18, 2024
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
Trolling of #MeToo: Audiences' Perceptions
Author Info
McWan, Blessy
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1648665408937175
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2022, Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Bowling Green State University, Media and Communication.
Abstract
Troll messages and campaigns are part of contemporary social movements backlash (Khan, 2020). So, this study aims to understand trolling of a contemporary social movement i.e., #MeToo movement. Precisely, this study probes
how audiences perceive trolling of #MeToo that they encounter.
To respond to this question, I conducted in-depth interviews of 22 research participants whose ages ranged from 22-63. Built on data analysis, three important categories of perceptions of trolling emerged. They are, i) trolling as dialogic- engaging in dialogue and discussion, ii) trolling as discursive closure – used to suppress the voices of victim/survivor and #MeToo movement, and iii) trolling as enigmatic- difficult to understand as sexual assault is a complex situation. The first two categories are contrasting in their views as one is considered valuable while the other is considered detrimental to #MeToo. The third category participants pointed out about the complexities of sexual assault/harassment situations and could not adequately interpret the purpose of trolling. It is also important to note that most of the participants (five out of seven) who viewed ‘trolling as dialogic’ were men. Whereas most of the participants (six out of seven) who viewed ‘trolling as discursive closure’ claimed to be an activist or activist ally. So, based on the first two categories of perceptions of trolling and the dimensions of gender and advocacy that play into these perceptions I argue that
trolling is perceived as an inherent part of online interaction informed by power struggle due to conflicting personal, political, or social opinions.
This perception of trolling is indicative of polarization of social media and perhaps enables the sectarian animosity on these networking sites. And trolling therefore, can be designated as a political problem of the modern society.
Committee
Joshua Atkinson, PhD (Committee Chair)
Jill Zeilstra-Ryalls, PhD (Other)
Lisa Hanasono, PhD (Committee Member)
Yanqin Lu, PhD (Committee Member)
Pages
136 p.
Subject Headings
Communication
;
Gender
;
Mass Communications
;
Mass Media
Keywords
Trolling
;
#MeToo
;
Perceptions
;
Contemporary Social Movements
;
Feminist Movements
;
Sexual Assault
;
Women
;
Audience
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
McWan, B. (2022).
Trolling of #MeToo: Audiences' Perceptions
[Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1648665408937175
APA Style (7th edition)
McWan, Blessy.
Trolling of #MeToo: Audiences' Perceptions.
2022. Bowling Green State University, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1648665408937175.
MLA Style (8th edition)
McWan, Blessy. "Trolling of #MeToo: Audiences' Perceptions." Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, 2022. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1648665408937175
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
bgsu1648665408937175
Copyright Info
© 2022, some rights reserved.
Trolling of #MeToo: Audiences' Perceptions by Blessy McWan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Based on a work at etd.ohiolink.edu.
This open access ETD is published by Bowling Green State University and OhioLINK.