Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

New Insights Into the Relationship Between Messenger RNA Translation and Degradation

Sweet, Thomas Jeffrey

Abstract Details

2011, Doctor of Philosophy, Case Western Reserve University, Biochemistry.

Concordant regulation of mRNA translation and 5’ to 3’ mRNA decay is critical for precise control of gene expression. 5’ to 3’ mRNA decay initiates with removal of the 3’ polyadenosine tail of mRNA (deadenylation). Deadenylation is followed by removal of the 5’ 7‐methylguanosine cap (decapping) then 5’ to 3’ exonucleolytic degradation of the mRNA.

Historically, the decay field viewed decapping and degradation of mRNA as occurring on ribosome‐free mRNAs. In brief, deadenylation occurred while mRNAs were still loaded with ribosomes. Removal of the poly(A) tail was thought to allow decapping activator proteins to inhibit translation initiation, which in turn led to run off of ribosomes and ultimately ribosome‐free mRNA. Ribosome‐free mRNA was then localized to distinct ribosome‐free subcellular sites termed processing bodies (P‐bodies) for either storage or decapping and 5’ to 3’ degradation.

In this body of work, we highlight three major findings that fundamentally altered this model. First, we discovered conditions that uncoupled the formation of P‐bodies from changes in decay and translation, suggesting that P‐bodies are not exclusive sites of bulk translational control and/or mRNA decay. Second, we show that decapping and degradation of mRNAs can occur while they are still engaged with polyribosomes, in stark contrast to the hypothesis that decay occurs in ribosome‐free P‐bodies. Finally, we show that the decapping activator protein Dhh1 regulates a late step in translation in the context of polyribosomes rather than inhibiting translation initiation and leading to ribosome‐free mRNA.

Based on these data, our model for the interface between translational control and 5’ to 3’ mRNA decay explicitly allows for degradation of polyribosome bound mRNAs rather than only ribosome‐free mRNAs. The new model also allows for regulation of translation at steps later than initiation (i.e. – possibly elongation, termination, or ribosome recycling), which would permit rapid translational responses. Our revised model is more comprehensive as well as more reflective of data from several organisms that indicate that translational control is not as simple as regulation of translation initiation, nor is decay as simple as localization of ribosome‐free mRNAs to P‐bodies.

William Merrick (Committee Chair)
Jeffery Coller (Advisor)
Eckhard Jankowsky (Committee Member)
Alan Tartakoff (Committee Member)
Maria Hatzoglou (Committee Member)
108 p.

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Sweet, T. J. (2011). New Insights Into the Relationship Between Messenger RNA Translation and Degradation [Doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=case1321298653

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Sweet, Thomas. New Insights Into the Relationship Between Messenger RNA Translation and Degradation. 2011. Case Western Reserve University, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=case1321298653.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Sweet, Thomas. "New Insights Into the Relationship Between Messenger RNA Translation and Degradation." Doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University, 2011. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=case1321298653

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)