Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
case1354387190.pdf (2.9 MB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
From Diwan to Palace: Jordanian Tribal Politics and Elections
Author Info
Weir, Laura C.
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=case1354387190
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2013, Doctor of Philosophy, Case Western Reserve University, Political Science.
Abstract
Despite the vast research by political science scholars on the persistence of authoritarian regimes in the Middle East, little is known about why citizens have not pushed for more democratic reforms. The recent Arab Spring has focused our attention on the few countries that have experienced revolt against their authoritarian leaders. Many of those transitions to democracy are still quite contested or in danger of failing. A similar scenario occurred in 1989 in Jordan when King Hussein allowed credibly free and fair elections. These elections should have led to more liberalizing reform and possible a true constitutional monarchy or democracy. Counterintuitively, they did not. This study looks at the reasons why an authoritarian state such as Jordan has remained intact. In large part, Jordan has remained a very conservative authoritarian state because of tribal politics. Tribal politics have erased the distinct boundaries between what is the state and what is private. Tribal politics in Jordan helps explain how the state is not a discrete monolith that is controlled exclusively by an authoritarian leader. Rather, over time, the state has evolved unevenly and in reaction to tribal groups who were looking to empower or enrich themselves. Different powerful tribes have captured various agencies of the state and rule them almost as part of their personal power. Previous research focuses on regime manipulations of the rules. This study offers a different perspective and set of causal factors for the explanation. While acknowledging regime manipulation exists, this case study suggests the evidence shows tribes are self-interested actors who use their own tribal sets of rules and sanctions to capture seats in the parliament. Examination of the succeeding elections illuminates how tribes are able to handle new regime rules and adapt to the new political opportunities in order to gain further power within the state.
Committee
Pete Moore, PhD (Committee Chair)
Vincent McHale, PhD (Committee Member)
Kelly McMann, PhD (Committee Member)
Neda Zawahri, PhD (Committee Member)
Pages
293 p.
Subject Headings
Political Science
Keywords
Jordan
;
tribal politics
;
elections
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Weir, L. C. (2013).
From Diwan to Palace: Jordanian Tribal Politics and Elections
[Doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=case1354387190
APA Style (7th edition)
Weir, Laura.
From Diwan to Palace: Jordanian Tribal Politics and Elections.
2013. Case Western Reserve University, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=case1354387190.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Weir, Laura. "From Diwan to Palace: Jordanian Tribal Politics and Elections." Doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University, 2013. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=case1354387190
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
case1354387190
Download Count:
6,070
Copyright Info
© 2012, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Case Western Reserve University School of Graduate Studies and OhioLINK.