Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
TSchroeder_Dissertation Final_6.10.16_Updated Sept 2019.pdf (995.47 KB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
Are you listening to me? An investigation of employee perceptions of listening.
Author Info
Schroeder, Tiffany, Schroeder
ORCID® Identifier
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4032-845X
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=case1465581382
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2016, Doctor of Philosophy, Case Western Reserve University, Organizational Behavior.
Abstract
Modern organizations rely on individuals to speak up with ideas, concerns, and suggestions. In short, they require employees to be proactive not just in the actions that they take, but in their communications as well. An accumulation of evidence from the areas of employee voice, silence, and issue-selling suggests that perceptions of listening are important for the open sharing of thoughts, concerns, and suggestions relating to the ongoing flow of work in organizations. Still, research lags when it comes to understanding the experience of listening and the path to its workplace outcomes. Specifically, there are a multitude of terms used to describe listening whereas there are few rigorous attempts to examine the process and properties from the perspective of the person who speaks up. This dissertation explores listening perceptions from multiple angles. First, drawing from interdependence theory I offer a conceptual explanation for how and why perceptions of listening are formed. Then, I draw on organizational support theory to suggest that listening is a powerful but missing predictor of perceived organizational support. To test the relative strength of perceived listening as a predictor of perceived organizational support I compared it against other well-known predictors using dominance analysis. Results from the analysis of survey data from 120 adults working in various fields suggest that perceived listening is an even more powerful predictor than was expected. Specifically, it completely dominated both leader-member exchange and perceived supervisor support in the prediction of perceived organizational support. Finally, I present the results of a qualitative study of 42 in-depth interviews with bank employees to address the research question `How do employees perceive and engage in workplace listening experiences?’ From these data I build a process model of listening perceptions. This model sheds light on the situations in which employees attend to listening, the people they see as key listeners, and the process through which they construct assessments of listening.
Committee
Ronald Fry (Committee Chair)
Corinne Coen (Committee Member)
Avraham Kluger (Committee Member)
Melvin Smith (Committee Member)
Casey Newmeyer (Committee Member)
Pages
175 p.
Subject Headings
Communication
;
Management
;
Organizational Behavior
Keywords
listening
;
communications
;
perceived organizational support
;
organizational support theory
;
OCB
;
well being
;
interdependence
;
relationships
;
perceptions
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Schroeder, Schroeder, T. (2016).
Are you listening to me? An investigation of employee perceptions of listening.
[Doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=case1465581382
APA Style (7th edition)
Schroeder, Schroeder, Tiffany.
Are you listening to me? An investigation of employee perceptions of listening.
2016. Case Western Reserve University, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=case1465581382.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Schroeder, Schroeder, Tiffany. "Are you listening to me? An investigation of employee perceptions of listening." Doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University, 2016. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=case1465581382
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
case1465581382
Download Count:
463
Copyright Info
© 2016, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Case Western Reserve University School of Graduate Studies and OhioLINK.