Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
Prasath Dissertation.pdf (4.9 MB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
IN VITRO BIOMECHANICAL TESTING AND COMPUTATIONAL MODELING IN SPINE
Author Info
Prasath, Mageswaran
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=csu1367503283
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2012, Doctor of Engineering, Cleveland State University, Fenn College of Engineering.
Abstract
Two separate in vitro biomechanical studies were conducted on human cadaveric spines (Lumbar) to evaluate the stability following the implantation of two different spinal fixation devices; interspinous fixation device (ISD) and Hybrid dynamic stabilizers. ISD was evaluated as a stand-alone and in combination with unilateral pedicle rod system. The results were compared against the gold standard, spinal fusion (bilateral pedicle rod system). The second study involving the hybrid dynamic system, evaluated the effect on adjacent levels using a hybrid testing protocol. A robotic spine testing system was used to conduct the biomechanical tests. This system has the ability to apply continuous unconstrained pure moments while dynamically optimizing the motion path to minimize off-axis loads during testing. Thus enabling precise control over the loading and boundary conditions of the test. This ensures test reliability and reproducibility. We found that in flexion-extension, the ISD can provide lumbar stability comparable to spinal fusion. However, it provides minimal rigidity in lateral bending and axial rotation when used as a stand-alone. The ISD with a unilateral pedicle rod system when compared to the spinal fusion construct were shown to provide similar levels of stability in all directions, though the spinal fusion construct showed a trend toward improved stiffness overall. The results for the dynamic stabilization system showed stability characteristics similar to a solid all metal construct. Its addition to the supra adjacent level (L3- L4) to the fusion (L4- L5) indeed protected the adjacent level from excessive motion. However, it essentially transformed a 1 level into a 2 level lumbar fusion with exponential transfer of motion to the fewer remaining discs (excessive adjacent level motion). The computational aspect of the study involved the development of a spine model (single segment). The kinematic data from these biomechanical studies (ISD study) was then used to validate a finite element model of the spine.
Committee
Robert McLain (Committee Chair)
Pages
141 p.
Subject Headings
Biomechanics
;
Biomedical Engineering
;
Biomedical Research
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Prasath, M. (2012).
IN VITRO BIOMECHANICAL TESTING AND COMPUTATIONAL MODELING IN SPINE
[Doctoral dissertation, Cleveland State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=csu1367503283
APA Style (7th edition)
Prasath, Mageswaran.
IN VITRO BIOMECHANICAL TESTING AND COMPUTATIONAL MODELING IN SPINE .
2012. Cleveland State University, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=csu1367503283.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Prasath, Mageswaran. "IN VITRO BIOMECHANICAL TESTING AND COMPUTATIONAL MODELING IN SPINE ." Doctoral dissertation, Cleveland State University, 2012. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=csu1367503283
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
csu1367503283
Download Count:
1,006
Copyright Info
© 2012, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Cleveland State University and OhioLINK.