Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Recognition Memory Revisited: An Aging and Electrophysiological Investigation

Jardin, Elliott C.

Abstract Details

2018, Doctor of Philosophy in Adult Development and Aging, Cleveland State University, College of Sciences and Health Professions.
This study provides a better understanding of contributing factors to age differences in human episodic memory. A recurrent finding in recognition memory is that older adults tend to have lower overall accuracy and tend to make fewer false-alarm errors in judging new items, relative miss errors (Coyne, Allen & Wickens, 1986; Danziger, 1980; Poon and Fozard 1980). Two possible causes for decline in these abilities include an age-related decrement in speed of processing (Salthouse 1991) and changes in information processing ability due to entropy (Allen, Kaufman, Smitch, & Propper 1998a; Mallik et al., in preparation). Additionally, age differences may be partially explained by a tendency for older adults to exhibit a conservative response bias. Surprisingly this study found no age-related differences in recognition memory accuracy, and older adults did not show a more conservative response bias. Due to these null results for age, the study examined the role of response bias (propensity to indicate a probe as being recognized, or new) on recognition memory accuracy and the role of the release from proactive interference (PI) across age. This study introduces a new ERP (Event-Related Potential) component to measure the recognition of “miss” responses called “FN400 Below Threshold”. This component, when looked at collapsed across Experiment 1 & Experiment 2 was positively correlated to behavioral accuracy suggesting that a more conservative response criterion hurts overall behavioral accuracy. Experiment 2 found that words learned from four categories were easier to remember than words from a single category due to a reduction in interference across items. This effect was found for both age groups.
Philip Allen (Advisor)
Eric Allard (Committee Member)
Karen Keptner (Committee Member)
Harvey Sterns (Committee Member)
Mei-Ching Lien (Committee Member)
115 p.

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Jardin, E. C. (2018). Recognition Memory Revisited: An Aging and Electrophysiological Investigation [Doctoral dissertation, Cleveland State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=csu1548157727480549

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Jardin, Elliott. Recognition Memory Revisited: An Aging and Electrophysiological Investigation . 2018. Cleveland State University, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=csu1548157727480549.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Jardin, Elliott. "Recognition Memory Revisited: An Aging and Electrophysiological Investigation ." Doctoral dissertation, Cleveland State University, 2018. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=csu1548157727480549

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)