Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
kent1239383998.pdf (48.52 MB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
Deliberative Decision-Making in One Medical Workplace Setting
Author Info
Teston, Christa Beth
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1239383998
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2009, PHD, Kent State University, College of Arts and Sciences / Department of English.
Abstract
This dissertation is a qualitative case study aimed at exploring the interdisciplinary deliberative process engaged in by medical professionals from a range of specialties in weekly Tumor Board meetings at a community hospital. Tumor Board meetings are collaborative deliberations about how to provide the best care for patients suffering from cancer. After observing over 40 patient case presentations at 23 different Tumor Board meetings, interviewing Tumor Board participants, and analyzing a set of representative medical workplace documents used by the Board, a substantive theory (Glaser & Strauss, 1967) about Tumor Board deliberations is proposed. Specifically, medical professionals’ deliberations are traced and analyzed for the kinds and forms of evidence invoked at particular times and in particular contexts during the meeting. Findings from this study have several implications for the field of rhetoric and writing studies. For instance, textual guidelines play a central role in the decision-making process. Theories about how medical professionals make explicit the relationship between claims and evidence vis-à-vis textual guidelines are explored, therefore. Also, medical images play a central role in the decision-making process. Theories about how various semiotic modes, particularly medical images, give way to certain argumentative affordances (Gibson, 1955) are also explored. Finally, theories about how to conduct site-based investigations of deliberative rhetoric are discussed—in particular, the ways in which stasis theory is useful for understanding how deliberative processes unfold.
Committee
Christina Haas, PhD (Committee Chair)
Raymond Craig, PhD (Committee Member)
Pamela Takayoshi, PhD (Committee Member)
Paul Levy, PhD (Committee Member)
Susan Roxburgh, PhD (Other)
Pages
217 p.
Subject Headings
Rhetoric
Keywords
deliberation
;
medical rhetoric
;
Toulmin
;
argumentation
;
visual rhetoric
;
grounded theory
;
Tumor Board
;
medical images
;
standard of care
;
decision-making
;
rhetoric
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Teston, C. B. (2009).
Deliberative Decision-Making in One Medical Workplace Setting
[Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1239383998
APA Style (7th edition)
Teston, Christa.
Deliberative Decision-Making in One Medical Workplace Setting.
2009. Kent State University, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1239383998.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Teston, Christa. "Deliberative Decision-Making in One Medical Workplace Setting." Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, 2009. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1239383998
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
kent1239383998
Download Count:
319
Copyright Info
© 2009, some rights reserved.
Deliberative Decision-Making in One Medical Workplace Setting by Christa Beth Teston is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Based on a work at etd.ohiolink.edu.
This open access ETD is published by Kent State University and OhioLINK.