Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Implications of Classroom Writing Instruction Emphasizing Imagination, Creativity, and Dialogue: A Case Study

Howell, Steven J.

Abstract Details

2011, PHD, Kent State University, College of Education, Health and Human Services / School of Teaching, Learning and Curriculum Studies.

When we consider the role of writing in our language arts classrooms today, I would argue that the vast majority of it is framed by Freire’s (1984) banking model of education, wherein we have a teacher who knows how to pass a standardized writing test and tries to deposit that information into the learner who knows nothing. In fact, to extend the metaphor, the only withdrawal that seems important to either the teacher or the student is what product the student creates at the time of the test. Somehow, we language arts teachers have found ourselves in the unfavorable position of having betrayed our own knowledge and expertise. Essentially, the problem that this study seeks to address is the surrendering of effective, creative, and imaginative writing strategies to the narrow scope of writing as evidence of understanding and standardized test preparation.

The purpose of this study was to inform three primary questions: 1. What are students’ perceptions of the use of the arts as a tool for writing and making meaning? 2. How would a deliberate, honest, and authentic approach to increasing and facilitating dialogue and communication in the language arts classroom affect students’ writing and/or their writing process? 3. What effect does using empathic literature selections have on students’ writing?

The study was a naturalistic case study that led to several findings. Of the arts, the study revealed that students demonstrated increased confidence in their writing and began to value the process of writing over the product. Further, students perceived this writing approach as new and freeing. Of dialogue, the study revealed that dialogue is a dynamic convention, one that constantly changes and rarely looks the same in different contexts, and that an honest, deliberate, authentic approach to increasing dialogue creates a comfort and familiarity that encourages writing as well as sharing. Finally, the use of empathic texts allowed students to demonstrate greater clarity and organization in their writing. Students also developed a new approach to voice and audience, and empathic texts fostered empathy within students’ writing.

William Kist, PhD (Advisor)
Averil McClelland, PhD (Committee Member)
Andrew Gilbert, PhD (Committee Member)
240 p.

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Howell, S. J. (2011). Implications of Classroom Writing Instruction Emphasizing Imagination, Creativity, and Dialogue: A Case Study [Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1301496875

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Howell, Steven. Implications of Classroom Writing Instruction Emphasizing Imagination, Creativity, and Dialogue: A Case Study. 2011. Kent State University, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1301496875.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Howell, Steven. "Implications of Classroom Writing Instruction Emphasizing Imagination, Creativity, and Dialogue: A Case Study." Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, 2011. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1301496875

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)