Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Theory, Method, and Democracy in the Social Sciences

Arnold, Robert V.

Abstract Details

2008, Master of Arts (MA), Ohio University, Political Science (Arts and Sciences).
This thesis examines the role of difference in methods and concepts in the social sciences. The first chapter presents a summarization and defense of two variants of pluralism, methodological and conceptual, in political science. These pluralisms suggest that there is value in engaging with ostensible incommensurabilities across subfields. The second and third chapters extend the analysis to the rest of the social sciences and show how two individuals, Amartya Sen and Avner Greif, may be seen as embodying some of the virtues of the two pluralisms. In the final chapter, the discussion of social scientific practice is tied to a theory of deliberative democracy; this results in a new vision of methodological discussions as a site of democratic deliberation and a new way of understanding democracy as a process of inquiry into one another's differences.
Julie A. White (Advisor)
James Mosher (Committee Member)
Takaaki Suzuki (Committee Member)
98 p.

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Arnold, R. V. (2008). Theory, Method, and Democracy in the Social Sciences [Master's thesis, Ohio University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ohiou1212757204

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Arnold, Robert. Theory, Method, and Democracy in the Social Sciences. 2008. Ohio University, Master's thesis. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ohiou1212757204.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Arnold, Robert. "Theory, Method, and Democracy in the Social Sciences." Master's thesis, Ohio University, 2008. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ohiou1212757204

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)