This dissertation examines the epistemic role of democratic processes in Malawi. In this study, I challenge the view that Malawi’s Local Government model of public participation is representative and open to all forms of knowledge production. Through a case study analysis of the political economy of knowledge production of selected District Councils in Malawi, I argue that the consultative approach adopted by the Councils is flawed. The Habermasian approach adopted by the Councils assumes that development processes should be free, fair, and accommodative of open forms of deliberation, consultation, and dissent. The Habermasian ideals stipulate that no single form of reasoning or knowledge dominates others. By advocating for “the power of the better argument” Habermas (1984, 1998a, 1998b, 2001) provided room for adversarial debate which is not encouraged in the Malawi local governance system. This study analyzes the departure from the ideals supposed to inform development initiatives by the Malawi Local Government through its District Councils. Power differential factors continue to undermine lay contribution and participation by considering its input second class. This undermining of local knowledge creates development processes that lack uMunthu in their approach. A systematic examination of the participatory processes and meaning making in Malawi’s democratic citizenship is used to argue that effective participation must demonstrate how political knowledge is created through inclusive processes such as public deliberation. I further argue that positive local ways of knowing and best practices in local cultures should be recognized and even internationalized towards general human improvement.