Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


osu1092833440.pdf (2.62 MB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

The emergence of distinctive features

Mielke, Jeff
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1092833440

Abstract Details

2004, Doctor of Philosophy, Ohio State University, Linguistics.
This dissertation proposes Emergent Feature Theory, a unified account of what were previously considered to be natural and unnatural classes. These classes are accounted for on the basis of phonetically-based generalization, sound change, and other factors, obviating the need to assume innate distinctive features. Evidence for the proposal comes from the first large-scale survey of natural classes. Based on data from 561 languages, the survey reveals that unnatural classes are widespread: among 6077 unique classes of sounds which are targets or triggers of phonological processes, analyzed in three popular feature theories (Preliminaries, Jakobson, Fant, and Halle 1954; SPE, Chomsky and Halle 1968; and Unified Feature Theory, Clements and Hume 1995), no single theory is able to characterize more than 71% of the classes, and over 24% are not characterizable in any of the theories. While other theories are able to account for specific subsets of these classes, none is able to predict the wide range of classes which actually occur and recur. It is shown that there is no objective way to partition classes into natural and idiosyncratic categories. Even without these findings, there are many reasons to be suspicious of the idea that distinctive features are innate. Humans have been evolving (separate from other primates) for a relatively short time. For all distinctive features, including the uncommon ones, to have emerged in the human genome, humans must have been exposed to contrasts motivating all of them at some time before the life of a common ancestor of all modern humans who would have all these features (all humans). This includes the distinctive features for sign languages, which appear to use entirely different phonological features and feature organization, even though deafness is generally not hereditary. All of this evidence, along with the survey results, point to the conclusion that the distinctive features used in language are learned rather than innate.
Elizabeth Hume (Advisor)
371 p.
Language, Linguistics
phonology; phonetics; natural classes; distinctive features

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Mielke, J. (2004). The emergence of distinctive features [Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1092833440

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Mielke, Jeff. The emergence of distinctive features. 2004. Ohio State University, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1092833440.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Mielke, Jeff. "The emergence of distinctive features." Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 2004. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1092833440

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

osu1092833440
3,696
© 2004, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by The Ohio State University and OhioLINK.