Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


osu1116868190.pdf (958.39 KB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Indecent bodies: gender and the monstrous in medieval English literature

Oswald, Dana M.
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1116868190

Abstract Details

2005, Doctor of Philosophy, Ohio State University, English.
While Old English literature rarely represents sexualized bodies, and just as rarely represents monsters, Middle English literature teems with bodies that are both sexualized and monstrous. In Old English, sexualized bodies appear in overlooked genres like bestiaries or travel narratives—the homes of monsters. Thus, monsters possess some of the only explicitly sexualized forms present in Old English texts. But it is not only the difference between paucity and abundance that marks the change from Old to Middle English monsters; it is also the shift from permanence to mutability. The bodies of Old English monsters are permanent and unchanging; many Middle English monsters, however, are capable of transformation. In order to study the shift from Old English monsters to those in Middle English, I offer four case studies, two Old English and two Middle English. I begin with a discussion of the desire by Old English writers and readers to erase the sexualized bodies of monsters in Wonders of the East. The author and characters in Beowulf, too, attempt to erase the monstrous and reproductive body of Grendel’s mother from the narrative, a tactic that only results in revealing the failure of human communities. In Middle English, monstrous bodies are trickier; they cannot be so easily erased. Because of their ability to transform, the monstrous bodies in Mandeville’s Travels either sexually under- or over-circulate in ways that disrupt proper community and class standards. However, the Middle English romance, Sir Gowther, presents a solution to the problem of the monstrous body; through penance, the child of a demon and a noble woman transforms physically and spiritually into a child of God. Most of these texts attempt to dispel the threat of the monster through erasure, be it the literal removal of the monstrous image, the killing of the monster, or the rehabilitation of the monster through religious means. Mandeville’s Travels, however, reminds us that monsters have infiltrated communities and cannot be easily recognized or erased. Only Mandeville’s Travels, then, acknowledges that the body and social system in which it exists are no longer stable.
Nicholas Howe (Advisor)
267 p.
Literature, English
medieval; gender; monster

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Oswald, D. M. (2005). Indecent bodies: gender and the monstrous in medieval English literature [Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1116868190

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Oswald, Dana. Indecent bodies: gender and the monstrous in medieval English literature. 2005. Ohio State University, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1116868190.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Oswald, Dana. "Indecent bodies: gender and the monstrous in medieval English literature." Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 2005. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1116868190

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

osu1116868190
16,478
© 2005, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by The Ohio State University and OhioLINK.