Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
osu1156276012.pdf (349.76 KB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
The stress-buffering effect of social support in gynecologic cancer survivors
Author Info
Carpenter, Kristen M.
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1156276012
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2006, Doctor of Philosophy, Ohio State University, Psychology.
Abstract
Research on cancer survivorship aims to identify adverse outcomes associated with diagnosis and treatment, including long-term side effects and late sequelae of treatment. Considering all prior quality of life studies in cancer survivorship, gynecologic cancer has largely been ignored. While a number of studies have examined the significant psychological and sexual morbidity that commonly occurs immediately following diagnosis and treatment (Andersen & Carpenter, 2003), much remains to be accomplished to detail and understand the psychosocial outcomes in long-term survivorship. Data from heterogeneous survivor samples suggest that social support is related to favorable physical and psychological outcomes. The present study tests social support as a moderator between health status and psychological outcomes, specifically, it tests the stress-buffering hypothesis, which states that those under the most stress benefit from social support (Cohen & Wills, 1985). In addition, this study documents various dimensions of cancer-related quality of life in a sample of gynecologic cancer survivors. It was hypothesized that poor cancer-related health status would be associated with increased levels of psychological distress and traumatic stress symptoms and that social support would moderate this relationship. A cross-sectional design was used and a series of hierarchical multiple linear regression models tested the buffering hypothesis. Patients in this sample demonstrated compromised health status, with scores generally in the range of cancer patients in active treatment or immediate follow-up and evidence of a variety of longstanding symptoms. These patients did not have exceptionally high levels of psychological distress or traumatic stress, though a significant proportion (8 % to 15%) reported symptoms in the clinically significant range. The hypothesis that poorer cancer-related health status would be associated with poorer psychological outcomes was unequivocally supported. While they did not provide evidence for moderation, the results for the psychological distress outcome indicated that those with better social support reported less psychological distress. Regarding the traumatic stress outcome, there was no evidence for a direct relationship with social support; however, results did provide evidence for stress buffering. Specifically, perceived support from friends and perceived availability of social resources appeared to protect patients from traumatic stress symptoms associated poor physical health status.
Committee
Barbara Andersen (Advisor)
Pages
123 p.
Subject Headings
Psychology, Clinical
Keywords
gynecologic cancer
;
social support
;
stress buffering
;
quality of life
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Carpenter, K. M. (2006).
The stress-buffering effect of social support in gynecologic cancer survivors
[Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1156276012
APA Style (7th edition)
Carpenter, Kristen.
The stress-buffering effect of social support in gynecologic cancer survivors.
2006. Ohio State University, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1156276012.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Carpenter, Kristen. "The stress-buffering effect of social support in gynecologic cancer survivors." Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 2006. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1156276012
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
osu1156276012
Download Count:
1,966
Copyright Info
© 2006, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by The Ohio State University and OhioLINK.