Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
osu1172263722.pdf (385.86 KB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
Epistemological beliefs of physics undergraduate and graduate students and faculty in the context of a well-structured and an ill-structured problem
Author Info
Mercan, Fatih C
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1172263722
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2007, Doctor of Philosophy, Ohio State University, Educational Studies: Hums, Science, Tech and Voc.
Abstract
This study examines epistemological beliefs of physics undergraduate and graduate students and faculty in the context of solving a well-structured and an ill-structured problem. The data collection consisted of a think aloud problem solving session followed by a semi-structured interview conducted with 50 participants, 10 participants at freshmen, seniors, masters, PhD, and faculty levels. The data analysis involved (a) identification of the range of beliefs about knowledge in the context of the well-structured and the ill-structured problem solving, (b) construction of a framework that unites the individual beliefs identified in each problem context under the same conceptual base, and (c) comparisons of the problem contexts and expertise level groups using the framework. The results of the comparison of the contexts of the well-structured and the ill-structured problem showed that (a) authoritative beliefs about knowledge were expressed in the well-structured problem context, (b) relativistic and religious beliefs about knowledge were expressed in the ill-structured problem context, and (c) rational, empirical, modeling beliefs about knowledge were expressed in both problem contexts. The results of the comparison of the expertise level groups showed that (a) undergraduates expressed authoritative beliefs about knowledge more than graduate students and faculty did not express authoritative beliefs, (b) faculty expressed modeling beliefs about knowledge more than graduate students and undergraduates did not express modeling beliefs, and (c) there were no differences in rational, empirical, experiential, relativistic, and religious beliefs about knowledge among the expertise level groups. As the expertise level increased the number of participants who expressed authoritative beliefs about knowledge decreased and the number of participants who expressed modeling based beliefs about knowledge increased. The results of this study implied that existing developmental and cognitive models of personal epistemology can explain personal epistemology in physics to a limited extent, however, these models cannot adequately account for the variation of epistemological beliefs across problem contexts. Modeling beliefs about knowledge emerged as a part of personal epistemology and an indicator of epistemological sophistication, which do not develop until extensive experience in the field. Based on these findings, the researcher recommended providing opportunities for practicing model construction for students.
Committee
Anita Roychoudhury (Advisor)
Pages
178 p.
Keywords
personal epistemology
;
epistemological beliefs
;
beliefs about knowledge
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Mercan, F. C. (2007).
Epistemological beliefs of physics undergraduate and graduate students and faculty in the context of a well-structured and an ill-structured problem
[Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1172263722
APA Style (7th edition)
Mercan, Fatih.
Epistemological beliefs of physics undergraduate and graduate students and faculty in the context of a well-structured and an ill-structured problem.
2007. Ohio State University, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1172263722.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Mercan, Fatih. "Epistemological beliefs of physics undergraduate and graduate students and faculty in the context of a well-structured and an ill-structured problem." Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 2007. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1172263722
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
osu1172263722
Download Count:
1,501
Copyright Info
© 2007, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by The Ohio State University and OhioLINK.