Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Examining and Integrating Transaction Cost Economics and Resource-Based View Explanations of the Firm’s Boundary Choices

Abstract Details

2010, Doctor of Philosophy, Ohio State University, Business Administration.

The three essays of this dissertation complement extant research by explicitly revealing the boundary conditions of the central predictions of transaction cost economics and by offering traceable novel insights from the integration of this approach and resource-based explanations of the firm’s boundary choices.

Chapter two employs a semi-formal modeling approach to examine the central predictions of transaction cost economics regarding asset specificity and governance forms. The analysis assumes away capability differences across firms. The approach factors several issues that are often acknowledged but rarely examined in the extant research, such as diminishing returns to transaction specific investment, endogeneity in asset specificity and governance form choices, lack of focus on both the parties in a transaction, and ex-ante alternative uses of resources. Incorporating these factors into the analysis provides a more precise articulation of the boundary conditions surrounding the central prediction of transaction cost economics.

Chapter three extends the semi-formal model presented in the chapter two by considering differences in productive capabilities across potential exchange partners to integrate transaction cost and resource-based perspectives on the firm’s boundary choices. In particular, the analysis focuses on whether and how differences in the levels of asset specificities across transaction stages and differences in the productive capabilities across potential partners affect governance mode choices. The analysis identifies the specific conditions where the application of the resource-based logic may alter standard transaction cost economics predictions.

Chapter four further extends the model by considering firm specific governance capabilities. It examines the relationship between governance capabilities and governance forms by integrating asset specificity, productive capability, and governance capability perspectives on the firm’s boundary choices. The analysis examines whether and how differences in productive capabilities across potential partners and the partner firm’s governance capabilities may affect the relationship between the focal firm’s governance capabilities and governance forms. This chapter suggests that only in specific conditions a firm’s governance capabilities related to a specific governance form favor that governance form.

The dissertation offers several opportunities for future research and presents an approach that can be exploited to examine these opportunities.

Jay Barney, PhD (Committee Chair)
Michael Leiblein, PhD (Committee Co-Chair)
Claudio Gonzalez-Vega, PhD (Committee Member)
Mona Makhija, PhD (Committee Member)
147 p.

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Khare, N. (2010). Examining and Integrating Transaction Cost Economics and Resource-Based View Explanations of the Firm’s Boundary Choices [Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1274916356

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Khare, Nilesh. Examining and Integrating Transaction Cost Economics and Resource-Based View Explanations of the Firm’s Boundary Choices. 2010. Ohio State University, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1274916356.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Khare, Nilesh. "Examining and Integrating Transaction Cost Economics and Resource-Based View Explanations of the Firm’s Boundary Choices." Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 2010. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1274916356

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)