Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
osu1345031917.pdf (635.87 KB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
Anesthetic Efficacy Of Buffered Lidocaine For Incision And Drainage In Symptomatic Patients With Clinical Swelling
Author Info
Balasco, Matthew B.
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1345031917
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2012, Master of Science, Ohio State University, Dentistry.
Abstract
The purpose of this randomized, double-blind investigation was to compare the efficacy of a buffered versus non-buffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine solution for pain of injection and incision and drainage of an acute apical abscess or cellulitis in symptomatic patients with a diagnosis of pulpal necrosis. Eighty-one adult patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups that received two infiltration injections (mesial and distal to the swelling) of either 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine buffered with 0.18 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate using the Onset® by Onpharma® buffering system or 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Patients rated pain of needle insertion, placement, and solution deposition for each injection on 170-mm visual analog scales. An incision and drainage procedure was performed and pain of incision, drainage, and dissection were recorded on 170-mm visual analog scales. No significant differences were detected between the two solutions for pain of needle insertion, placement, or solution deposition for either the mesial or distal site injections. No significant differences were found between the solutions for pain of incision, drainage, or dissection. In conclusion, the addition of a sodium bicarbonate buffer to 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine did not result in decreased pain of infiltration injection or decreased pain of incision and drainage when compared to standard 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in symptomatic patients experiencing an acute apical abscess or cellulitis.
Committee
Melissa Drum, D.D.S., M.S. (Committee Chair)
Al Reader, D.D.S., M.S. (Committee Member)
John Nusstein, D.D.S., M.S. (Committee Member)
Michael Beck, D.D.S., M.A. (Committee Member)
Pages
187 p.
Subject Headings
Dentistry
Keywords
Buffered lidocaine
;
abscess
;
incision and drainage
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Balasco, M. B. (2012).
Anesthetic Efficacy Of Buffered Lidocaine For Incision And Drainage In Symptomatic Patients With Clinical Swelling
[Master's thesis, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1345031917
APA Style (7th edition)
Balasco, Matthew.
Anesthetic Efficacy Of Buffered Lidocaine For Incision And Drainage In Symptomatic Patients With Clinical Swelling.
2012. Ohio State University, Master's thesis.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1345031917.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Balasco, Matthew. "Anesthetic Efficacy Of Buffered Lidocaine For Incision And Drainage In Symptomatic Patients With Clinical Swelling." Master's thesis, Ohio State University, 2012. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1345031917
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
osu1345031917
Download Count:
4,177
Copyright Info
© 2012, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by The Ohio State University and OhioLINK.