Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


MakingDoForTheMAsses.pdf (659.8 MB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Making Do for the Masses: Imperial Debris and a New Russian Constructivism

Walworth, Catherine
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1366044910

Abstract Details

2013, Doctor of Philosophy, Ohio State University, History of Art.
Russian Constructivist artists rejected the “elitist” medium of painting and instead set about redesigning the objects of everyday life under socialism in a devastated and “closed” economy. This dissertation expands the conventional art historical narrative by arguing that Constructivism adapted, rather than failed, in the 1920s. In so doing, I identify an alternative Constructivist strain that developed a tactic of recycling and re-appropriation in response to factory shortages and lack of raw materials. I examine how the former Imperial era’s debris became both the physical and ideological building material for its class enemies’ society, and the repository of lost Constructivist ideals. Applying anthropological models borrowed from Claude Levi-Strauss, I show how his mythmaker typologies—the “engineer” and “bricoleur”— illustrate, respectively, the canonical Constructivists and Russian artists on the margins that deployed a wide range of clever “make-do” tactics. I show how specific examples of existing porcelain “blanks,” clothing, film footage, and architecture from the newly requisitioned “collective stock” underwent transformation. For example, at Paris’s glamorous international exposition of industrial and decorative arts in 1925, a former Russian dressmaker to the Imperial Court received a grand prize for a flapper dress sewn from household table linens. Similarly, while the Soviets had to import Western “capitalist” films to compensate for the shortage of raw film stock in the 1920s, filmmaker Esfir Shub recycled Imperial-era film footage, creating Fall of the Romanov Dynasty, a masterpiece of Soviet propaganda and first feature-length compilation film. St. Petersburg’s Winter Palace, a symbol of Imperial rule and splendor, became a shifting stage for performance, government offices, a museum of the revolution, film set, and at the end of the 1920s, auction house. Similarly, leftover Imperial porcelain dishes, with marks from three previous tsars on their bases, now carried Bolshevik propaganda on their surfaces. These were portable artistic objects whose meanings came from their status as captured loot, a radical surface for socialist themed decoration by State Porcelain Factory artists. Yet, if these artists made innovative use of materials on hand, their methodological approach had already been modeled by the Bolshevik government’s reallotment of aristocratic mansions and reuse of requisitioned private goods. My study is intended, not merely to add these works to the Constructivist canon, but to change the shape of the current discussion, broadening the definitions of “mass production” and “industrial art” as well. Re-appropriated fragments of a former enemy era provided a wider range of play and possibility in the decade between 1918 and 1928. The use of scavenged Imperial leftovers as “raw materials” was economically strategic, but it also allowed artists to manipulate ideology embedded in the found material, creating objects with radically new emotional and symbolic trajectories.
Myroslava M. Mudrak (Advisor)
J. Ronald Green (Committee Member)
Aron Vinegar (Committee Member)
Patricia A. Cunningham (Committee Member)
489 p.
Art History; Economic History; Film Studies; Russian History; Slavic Studies; Theater
Russian Constructivism; Nadezhda Lamanova, Esfir Shub, Varvara Stepanova; Aleksandr Rodchenko; October Revolution; Soviet Film; Russian Fashion

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Walworth, C. (2013). Making Do for the Masses: Imperial Debris and a New Russian Constructivism [Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1366044910

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Walworth, Catherine. Making Do for the Masses: Imperial Debris and a New Russian Constructivism . 2013. Ohio State University, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1366044910.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Walworth, Catherine. "Making Do for the Masses: Imperial Debris and a New Russian Constructivism ." Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 2013. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1366044910

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

osu1366044910
178
© 2013, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by The Ohio State University and OhioLINK.