Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
Graham E. Cooper's Final MA Thesis For Submission.pdf (818.36 KB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
Is Poor Thought Suppression Integral to Pathological Worry?
Author Info
Cooper, Graham E
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1416493396
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2014, Master of Arts, Ohio State University, Psychology.
Abstract
Past theory on intrusive worry (e.g., Wells and Carter 1999) suggests that intrusive worry reflects, in part, the worrier's poor success at, and excessive reliance on, thought suppression to control their negative thoughts. That is, high worriers should be expected to experience difficulty in suppressing their unwanted thoughts, and attempts to nonetheless do so should results in greater accessibility of those thoughts (Wenzlaff & Wegner, 2000). Yet, empirical evidence supporting this theory has been rare, and recent research (Iijima & Tanno, 2012) has found that there are some high worriers who are able to successfully suppress unwanted thoughts, with this success predicting a reduced likelihood of ironic rebound. In a sample of 58 college students and using a standard laboratory thought suppression paradigm, the present study sought to replicate the findings by Iijima and Tanno (2012). Furthermore, individual differences in effortful control (EC) were proposed as an explanation for differential suppression success among high worriers. Specifically, we expected that the association between worry and thought suppression success is moderated by EC and the association between worry and ironic consequences of suppression is mediated by initial suppression success. We also tested the hypothesis that high worriers who suppress well will be less likely than their poor suppressing counterparts to show evidence of pathological worry (e.g., they should be less likely to meet diagnostic criteria for Generalized Anxiety Disorder [GAD]). The results successfully replicated the findings by Iijima and Tanno (2012). However, contrary to expectations there was no evidence to suggest that individual differences in EC account for differential suppression success among high worriers. Furthermore, suppression success did not moderate the association between worry and any indicators of pathological worry. Thus, high worriers who suppressed successfully in the thought suppression task were not less likely than their poor suppressing counterparts to meet GAD criteria or to score high on measures of other indicators of pathological worry. This suggests that thought suppression difficulties may not play an important role in pathological worry. However, the fact that success in the thought suppression task did not predict differences in questionnaire-based measures of thought intrusions frequency and thought suppression success during the participants' daily lives, raises doubt about the thought suppression task’s ecological validity. Furthermore, there was evidence to suggest that self-reported thought suppression success moderates the relationship between worry and symptoms of pathological worry. Specifically, for those individuals reporting low levels of suppression success, high worry was more strongly associated with certain symptoms of pathological worry than it was for individuals reporting high levels of suppression success. Thus, research on suppression among worriers should not presuppose that high worriers will experience failure on a laboratory suppression task, but neither should it presuppose that performance on such a task is an accurate representation of a worrier's true thought suppression abilities.
Committee
Michael Vasey, Ph.D. (Advisor)
Julian Thayer, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Amelia Aldao, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Pages
68 p.
Subject Headings
Clinical Psychology
;
Psychology
Keywords
Worry
;
GAD
;
Thought Suppression
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Cooper, G. E. (2014).
Is Poor Thought Suppression Integral to Pathological Worry?
[Master's thesis, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1416493396
APA Style (7th edition)
Cooper, Graham.
Is Poor Thought Suppression Integral to Pathological Worry?
2014. Ohio State University, Master's thesis.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1416493396.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Cooper, Graham. "Is Poor Thought Suppression Integral to Pathological Worry?" Master's thesis, Ohio State University, 2014. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1416493396
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
osu1416493396
Download Count:
405
Copyright Info
© 2014, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by The Ohio State University and OhioLINK.