Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

The Limits of Peer Influence: A Social (Dis)Affirmation Explanation of How Online Ratings Influence Trust in Factual Corrections

Neo, Rachel
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1459984656

Abstract Details

2016, Doctor of Philosophy, Ohio State University, Communication.
Political misperceptions pose a serious threat to democracy, making it imperative to understand how to correct such false beliefs. Online ratings could play an important role in this process. Research on bandwagon effects suggests that favorable online ratings should help make corrections more persuasive by fostering trust in such messages. The assumption that online ratings are uniformly persuasive is, however, overly simplistic. I argue that online ratings will not always promote acceptance of corrections. In what I term the social affirmation heuristic, I hypothesize that people will only trust ratings of factual corrections that affirm what they already believe, and vice versa. I further predict that rating trust will influence subsequent trust in corrections. Taken together, this means that belief discrepant ratings can have boomerang effects. Instead of eliciting the bandwagon effects described above, favorable ratings promote distrust of belief discrepant corrections. It is, however, possible for belief uncertainty and de-biasing messages to limit these boomerang effects by reducing reliance on the social affirmation heuristic. I expect these predictions to hold for various kinds of ratings, including both star ratings, which indicate rater favorability toward content, and Likes, which indicate the number of raters who see value in the content. This dissertation uses two studies to test these ideas. The first study uses data from an online experiment conducted with convenience sample of 847 participants. The data for the second study come from a nationally representative sample of 500 participants. With the exception of the hypothesis that belief confidence affects rating trust, all hypotheses received robust support in the context of star ratings. Implications of these findings are discussed.
Kelly Garrett (Advisor)
Dave Ewoldsen (Committee Member)
Dave DeAndrea (Committee Member)
Erik Nisbet (Committee Member)
127 p.
Communication

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Neo, R. (2016). The Limits of Peer Influence: A Social (Dis)Affirmation Explanation of How Online Ratings Influence Trust in Factual Corrections [Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1459984656

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Neo, Rachel. The Limits of Peer Influence: A Social (Dis)Affirmation Explanation of How Online Ratings Influence Trust in Factual Corrections. 2016. Ohio State University, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1459984656.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Neo, Rachel. "The Limits of Peer Influence: A Social (Dis)Affirmation Explanation of How Online Ratings Influence Trust in Factual Corrections." Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 2016. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1459984656

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

osu1459984656
626
© 2016, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by The Ohio State University and OhioLINK.