Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
Slagle (2016) Dissertation Final.pdf (4.31 MB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
Social and Psychological Drivers of Public Involvement in Large Carnivore Management
Author Info
Slagle, Kristina M
ORCID® Identifier
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6270-7568
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1461335098
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2016, Doctor of Philosophy, Ohio State University, Environment and Natural Resources.
Abstract
Large predators are returning to ecosystems in the U.S., and their conservation is an ongoing, perhaps symbolically-driven challenge for wildlife agencies. Current research on public tolerance of carnivores is limited by scale, little theoretical direction, and difficult to replicate measures. Addressing the issue of symbolic meaning, we coded qualitative responses to an open ended survey question regarding salient thoughts and images of wolves for concrete and abstract content. We found that most respondents think of wolves abstractly, though residents of the Northern Rocky Mountains were almost evenly split between abstract vs. concrete thoughts about wolves, and individuals strongly identifying as hunters, gun rights advocates, property rights advocates, or farmer/rancher were more likely to think of wolves concretely. Next, we address existing limitations in current research with two studies that bring theories of risk and decision making to bear on policy-relevant behaviors indicating stewardship and intolerance for wildlife. Modeling wolves as a hazard, we consider the impact of affect, knowledge, risk and benefit on tolerance for wolves among an issue public. We found both stewardship and intolerant behaviors to be well predicted by our model among this sample (r2 > .85), and in particular, we found affect for wolves and perceived benefits of recovery to be the most predictive of behavior. In a public sample, a modified hazard model poorly predicts intolerance, but predicted 22% of the variance in stewardship, driven primarily by perceived benefits, which were in turn predicted by trust in the managing agency and positive affect for wolves. Together, these studies indicate some potentially motivated reasoning among the issue public, whose behavioral intentions were largely predicted either directly or indirectly by affect, and emphasize the overall importance of benefits in predicting tolerance. Conflict over carnivore management will require more than simple outreach to the public for resolution. Trusted agencies leveraging perceptions of benefit might increase tolerance for carnivore conservation, but addressing concrete risks among those with more negative affect will still be necessary. This research suggests that where the wild things will be is where there is a holistic approach to stakeholder engagement.
Committee
Robyn Wilson (Advisor)
Jeremy Bruskotter (Advisor)
Eric Toman (Committee Member)
Pages
184 p.
Subject Headings
Environmental Management
;
Environmental Science
;
Environmental Studies
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Slagle, K. M. (2016).
Social and Psychological Drivers of Public Involvement in Large Carnivore Management
[Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1461335098
APA Style (7th edition)
Slagle, Kristina.
Social and Psychological Drivers of Public Involvement in Large Carnivore Management.
2016. Ohio State University, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1461335098.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Slagle, Kristina. "Social and Psychological Drivers of Public Involvement in Large Carnivore Management." Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 2016. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1461335098
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
osu1461335098
Download Count:
688
Copyright Info
© 2016, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by The Ohio State University and OhioLINK.