Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
Final Thesis PDF.pdf (1.45 MB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
Anesthetic Efficacy of an Upright Versus a Supine Position for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block
Author Info
Crowley, Chase Elliott
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1470051706
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2016, Master of Science, Ohio State University, Dentistry.
Abstract
Introduction: Malamed (12) recommends positioning patients upright for anesthetic administration believing it will help improve pulpal anesthetic success. The purpose of this study was to compare anesthetic success in healthy subjects with vital, asymptomatic teeth when an inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) block was given in an upright and supine position. Materials and Methods: One hundred-ten healthy subjects were given inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANB) using 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine while in the upright and supine position, at two different appointments, spaced at least two weeks apart. Subjects used a Heft-Parker VAS to report pain of needle insertion, needle placement, and solution deposition. The molars, premolars, and incisors were tested with an electric pulp tester (EPT) every four minutes for fifty-five minutes post-injection. Pulpal anesthesia was considered successful when two consecutive 80/80 EPT readings were recorded within fifteen minutes of the injection, and the 80/80 readings were sustained for 55 minutes. Results: Injection pain in both upright and supine groups, on average, was reported as mild, except for needle placement, which was reported as moderate. In the upright group, pulpal anesthetic success rates were 65.5% for second molars, 53.6% for first molars, 52.7% for second premolars, 57.3% for first premolars, 22.7% for lateral incisors, and 8.2% for central incisors. In the supine group, success rates were 72.7% in second molars, 59.1% in first molars, 62.7% in second premolars, 75.5% for first premolars, 28.2% for lateral incisors, and 10.9% for central incisors. Pulpal anesthesia was statistically more successful in the supine group (p=0.0009). Conclusions: The supine position was found to be statistically more successful than the upright position. However, the difference may not be big enough to be significant clinically since a large percentage in each group was not numb.
Committee
Melissa Drum, DDS, MS (Advisor)
Pages
129 p.
Subject Headings
Dentistry
Keywords
local anesthesia, inferior alveolar nerve block, positioning
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Crowley, C. E. (2016).
Anesthetic Efficacy of an Upright Versus a Supine Position for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block
[Master's thesis, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1470051706
APA Style (7th edition)
Crowley, Chase.
Anesthetic Efficacy of an Upright Versus a Supine Position for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block.
2016. Ohio State University, Master's thesis.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1470051706.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Crowley, Chase. "Anesthetic Efficacy of an Upright Versus a Supine Position for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block." Master's thesis, Ohio State University, 2016. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1470051706
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
osu1470051706
Download Count:
1,201
Copyright Info
© 2016, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by The Ohio State University and OhioLINK.