Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
Evaluation of Tests of Suppression Final Draft 42017.pdf (636.43 KB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
Screening of Children Study: Evaluation of Tests of Suppression
Author Info
Pallet, Lauren J
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1492616795726485
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2017, Master of Science, Ohio State University, Vision Science.
Abstract
Background: Suppression is a phenomenon whereby an individual develops the ability to ignore a part of their binocular visual field. This condition is associated with binocular vision conditions such as amblyopia and anisometropia. Current commercial methods of testing suppression measure only foveal or central suppression at one test distance. Purpose: The purpose of our study was to assess a new suppression target on an iPad that provides consistent luminance and assesses foveal and central suppression at one testing distance. Methods: Subjects aged 3 and older that presented for a routine eye examination at The Ohio State College of Optometry were invited to participate in our study. Routine testing including visual acuity, dry and wet refraction/retinoscopy, stereopsis and cover test were performed by the doctor and recorded by the examiner. Each of the suppression tests were then performed by the examiner in a random order, and repeated with the colored filters reversed. The results for each test were recorded. Cross-tabulation and McNemar chi-square analysis was used to compare the suppression testing devices. Results: Fifty subjects were enrolled (mean age = 17.5). Twelve subjects reported suppression and one reported diplopia. Testability was excellent for all tests. There was no significant difference between tests in reported suppression, with all p values equal to .22 or greater. No difference in reported suppression was observed with change in orientation of the anaglyphic filters. Six subjects reported foveal suppression alone at near which was not identified with Worth 4 dot. Conclusion: The iPad test of suppression provided high testability and excellent agreement with commonly used tests of suppression.
Committee
Marjean Kulp, OD, MS (Advisor)
Andrew Toole, OD, PhD (Committee Member)
Catherine McDaniel, OD, MS (Committee Member)
Pages
51 p.
Subject Headings
Ophthalmology
Keywords
suppression, amblyopia, iPad
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Pallet, L. J. (2017).
Screening of Children Study: Evaluation of Tests of Suppression
[Master's thesis, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1492616795726485
APA Style (7th edition)
Pallet, Lauren .
Screening of Children Study: Evaluation of Tests of Suppression.
2017. Ohio State University, Master's thesis.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1492616795726485.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Pallet, Lauren . "Screening of Children Study: Evaluation of Tests of Suppression." Master's thesis, Ohio State University, 2017. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1492616795726485
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
osu1492616795726485
Download Count:
1,063
Copyright Info
© 2017, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by The Ohio State University and OhioLINK.