Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

PRIVACY: ARCHITECTURE IN SUPPORT OF PRIVACY REGULATION

WITTE, NATHAN ALLAN

Abstract Details

2003, MARCH, University of Cincinnati, Design, Architecture, Art, and Planning : Architecture.
Architecture often fails to meet people’s need for privacy. This failure is not for a lack of trying, but rather due to a lack of understanding privacy as the process of regulating interaction with others. Privacy is often misconstrued as the shutting out of interaction. Privacy is a dialectic process of increasing and decreasing interaction. Desires for interaction are dynamic and varying, shifting through time and from person to person. Behavioral mechanisms such as personal space, verbal and preverbal communications, and territory are used to regulate privacy. Architecture often fails to respond to the dynamics and variations of privacy desires, rather imposing an environment supporting a fixed level of interaction, against which occupants must struggle. Environments should be supportive of the user’s privacy needs, facilitating the behavioral processes used to regulate interaction.
MICHAEL McINTURF (Advisor)
79 p.

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • WITTE, N. A. (2003). PRIVACY: ARCHITECTURE IN SUPPORT OF PRIVACY REGULATION [Master's thesis, University of Cincinnati]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1053701814

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • WITTE, NATHAN. PRIVACY: ARCHITECTURE IN SUPPORT OF PRIVACY REGULATION. 2003. University of Cincinnati, Master's thesis. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1053701814.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • WITTE, NATHAN. "PRIVACY: ARCHITECTURE IN SUPPORT OF PRIVACY REGULATION." Master's thesis, University of Cincinnati, 2003. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1053701814

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)