Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


ucin1147887701.pdf (908.82 KB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Sex and the Soul: Plato’s Equality Argument in the Republic

Parker, Michael L.
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1147887701

Abstract Details

2006, PhD, University of Cincinnati, Arts and Sciences : Philosophy.
Plato is distinguished as one of the earliest Western philosophers to offer a philosophical argument for the equality of men and women. His primary argument for equality is presented in Book V of the Republic (451-457), and culminates with the claim that everything said about men applies equally to women in the sculpting of rulers for his ideal city (Republic 540c). He argues specifically that women are equal to men to serve as Guardians. Scholars have engaged in extended discussion over the meaning of this argument, including vigorous debate by modern feminist scholars. Not as much attention, however, has been given to the philosophical basis upon which Plato makes his case for equality. This dissertation is an inquiry into Plato’s philosophical basis for his equality claim. From the Guard Dog Analogy (Republic Book II), the Equality Argument (Republic Book V), and the Myth of Er (Republic Book X) the conclusion is reached that Plato’s equality claim is based upon his metaphysical conception of the soul. In part, Plato’s conception is that souls are equal in their origin and design; souls are the source of life and knowledge in the bodies they incarnate; and souls are asexual. From this foundation Plato makes his claim that men and women are equally capable to serve as Guardians inasmuch as the requirements of Guardianship have to do with features located in the soul, not the body. Since souls are asexual, sexual difference is irrelevant to Guardian service. This thesis is explored from three different perspectives: first, from within Plato’s corpus, primarily the Republic, although including the Timaeus; second, in relation to the broader nomos - phusis discourse, including Xenophon, Antiphon, and Euripides; and third, with respect to its continuity in Plato’s Laws.
Dr. Lawrence Jost (Advisor)
198 p.
Philosophy
Plato; Republic; Equality; Feminism; Guard Dog Analogy; Myth of Er; Laws; Nature; Soul; Phusis; Nomos; Female Nature; Guardians

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Parker, M. L. (2006). Sex and the Soul: Plato’s Equality Argument in the Republic [Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1147887701

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Parker, Michael. Sex and the Soul: Plato’s Equality Argument in the Republic. 2006. University of Cincinnati, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1147887701.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Parker, Michael. "Sex and the Soul: Plato’s Equality Argument in the Republic." Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, 2006. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1147887701

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

ucin1147887701
2,292
© 2006, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by University of Cincinnati and OhioLINK.