Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
ucin1155239740.pdf (384.33 KB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
THE RELATIVE INFLUENCE OF VISUAL ROTATIONAL KINEMATICS AND INERTIA ON THE PERCEPTION OF HEAVINESS
Author Info
STREIT, MATTHEW S
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1155239740
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2006, MA, University of Cincinnati, Arts and Sciences : Psychology.
Abstract
Perceived heaviness of wielded objects has been shown to be a function of the rotational inertia of the wielded objects—the objects’ resistance to the rotational acceleration involved in wielding (e.g., Amazeen & Turvey, 1996). For example, if the resistance of an object to up-down wielding increases, the object will feel heavier. Streit, Shockley, Morris, and Riley (in press) hypothesized that the rotational inertia of a wielded object is optically specified by rotational kinematics—for a given applied force, the resulting motion is lawfully related to the resistance of an object to rotational acceleration. In support of their hypothesis, they demonstrated that if a virtual object rotates at a faster rate than the actual wielded object, the wielded object is perceived as systematically lighter and vice versa. Presumably, the visual (optically specified rotational inertia) and haptic (rotational inertia) sources of information are independent and additive sources that each directly map to perception (cf., Amazeen, 1999; Riley & Turvey, 2001). Seventeen participants estimated the heaviness of wielded objects. Rotational Inertia was manipulated by adjusting the position of a mass attached to the wielded object. Rotational kinematics were manipulated by applying a scaling factor to the rotational motion of virtual renderings of wielded objects—Rotational Gain. I predicted that perceived heaviness would be inversely proportional to Rotational Gain and proportional to Rotational Inertia. Results showed that both factors significantly influenced perceived heaviness, with no interaction. As predicted, Rotational Gain was inversely proportional to perceived heaviness and Rotational Inertia was proportional to perceived heaviness. The pattern of results supports the hypothesis of Streit et al. that rotational inertia can be detected both visually and haptically and that these sources of perceptual information may be perceptually independent.
Committee
Dr. Kevin Shockley (Advisor)
Pages
35 p.
Subject Headings
Psychology, Experimental
Keywords
inertia
;
rotational kinematics
;
heaviness
;
perception
;
specification
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
STREIT, M. S. (2006).
THE RELATIVE INFLUENCE OF VISUAL ROTATIONAL KINEMATICS AND INERTIA ON THE PERCEPTION OF HEAVINESS
[Master's thesis, University of Cincinnati]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1155239740
APA Style (7th edition)
STREIT, MATTHEW.
THE RELATIVE INFLUENCE OF VISUAL ROTATIONAL KINEMATICS AND INERTIA ON THE PERCEPTION OF HEAVINESS.
2006. University of Cincinnati, Master's thesis.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1155239740.
MLA Style (8th edition)
STREIT, MATTHEW. "THE RELATIVE INFLUENCE OF VISUAL ROTATIONAL KINEMATICS AND INERTIA ON THE PERCEPTION OF HEAVINESS." Master's thesis, University of Cincinnati, 2006. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1155239740
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
ucin1155239740
Download Count:
691
Copyright Info
© 2006, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by University of Cincinnati and OhioLINK.