Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
ucin1212003114.pdf (792.55 KB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
Predicting Vigilance Performance, Stress, and Coping with Individual Difference Measures
Author Info
SHAW, TYLER HARRISON
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1212003114
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2008, PhD, University of Cincinnati, Arts and Sciences : Psychology.
Abstract
One goal for the current investigation was to determine the extent to which vigilance performance can be predicted using individual difference measures involving personality and intelligence. The vigilance task, adapted from Temple et al. (2000), consisted of pairs of capital letters that included any combination of an O, D, and a backwards D. In the low task complexity condition, critical signals for detection were pairs of Os. In the high task complexity condition, critical signals for detection were any pairs of identical letters (i.e. two Ds, two backwards Ds, or two Os). Personality was measured using broad personality traits, namely the NEO-FFI, as well as a factor-analytically derived personality battery that yielded a four factor solution: Cognitive Disorganization, Heightened Experience, Sleep Quality, and Impulsivity. Intelligence was measured by two tests extracted from the Educational Testing Service Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests (Ekstrom et al., 1976): the Letter Sets Test, a measure of fluid intelligence, and the Advanced Vocabulary Test, a measure of crystallized intelligence. A second goal for this investigation was to determine the extent to which the characteristic stress response often associated with vigilance tasks as measured by the Dundee Stress State Questionnaire (DSSQ), i.e. an increase in distress and loss of task engagement, could be predicted by the NEO-FFI, the personality battery, and the intelligence measures. A final goal was to determine the extent to which choice of coping strategy measured by the Coping Inventory for Task Situations (CITS; Matthews and Campbell, 1998) could be predicted by the NEO-FFI, the personality battery, and the intelligence measures. Fluid intelligence and extraversion emerged as predictors for vigilance performance. While the derived personality battery did not directly predict performance, the Cognitive Disorganization factor, characterized by absentmindedness and daydreaming, predicted the stress associated with vigilance tasks. Fluid intelligence predicted both positive (task-focused) and negative (avoidance) coping strategies during a vigilance task. In sum, a test battery consisting of measures of fluid intelligence, extraversion, and cognitive disorganization has the potential of being of effective value in selecting operators for vigilance assignments.
Committee
Joel Warm, PhD (Committee Co-Chair)
Gerald Matthews, PhD (Committee Co-Chair)
Ken Ghee, PhD (Committee Member)
Pages
121 p.
Subject Headings
Psychology
Keywords
Vigilance
;
sustained attention
;
selection
;
personality
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
SHAW, T. H. (2008).
Predicting Vigilance Performance, Stress, and Coping with Individual Difference Measures
[Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1212003114
APA Style (7th edition)
SHAW, TYLER.
Predicting Vigilance Performance, Stress, and Coping with Individual Difference Measures.
2008. University of Cincinnati, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1212003114.
MLA Style (8th edition)
SHAW, TYLER. "Predicting Vigilance Performance, Stress, and Coping with Individual Difference Measures." Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, 2008. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1212003114
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
ucin1212003114
Download Count:
3,669
Copyright Info
© 2008, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by University of Cincinnati and OhioLINK.