Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Prevalence of Workers with Shifts in Hearing by Industry: A Comparison of Occupational Noise Exposure Regulation Criteria

Masterson, Elizabeth A.

Abstract Details

2012, PhD, University of Cincinnati, Medicine: Epidemiology (Environmental Health).

Background: Twenty-two million workers are exposed to hazardous noise in the United States. Occupational hearing loss can occur when workers are exposed to loud noise or ototoxic chemicals. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of workers with National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) significant threshold shifts (NSTS), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standard threshold shifts (OSTS), and OSTS with age correction (OSTS-A) among U.S. industries, and to compare the prevalence across regulation criteria.

Methods: 2000-2008 audiograms for male and female workers ages 18-65, who had higher occupational noise exposures than the general population, were examined. Prevalence and adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) for NSTS, OSTS and OSTS-A were estimated and compared across industries. McNemar’s Test comparisons were also performed to compare the estimated prevalence of NSTS to OSTS and NSTS to OSTS-A, for each demographic and industry. P-values were generated for each comparison.

Results: 20% of workers had NSTS, 14% had OSTS and 7% had OSTS-A. Industries with the highest prevalence for NSTS, OSTS, and OSTS-A were Healthcare and Social Assistance (26%, 17% and 8%), Primary Metal Manufacturing (25%, 16% and 8%), Miscellaneous Manufacturing (25%, 18% and 9%), and Real Estate and Rental and Leasing (24%, 18% and 10%).The prevalences of workers with OSTS and OSTS-A were about 66-70% and 30-33% of the prevalence of workers with NSTS, respectively.

Conclusions: After 40 years of progress in hearing conservation research and technology, current regulations should be updated. OSTS likely fails to identify a third of the workers who need intervention and OSTS-A does not identify 65-75%. Workers in the industries identified above need better engineering controls for noise and stronger hearing conservation strategies. More research is needed within "low-risk" industries to identify exposed workers and the mechanisms involved, and more effective worker training practices need to be developed.

Marepalli Rao, PhD (Committee Chair)
Marie Sweeney, PhD, MPH (Committee Member)
James Deddens, PhD (Committee Member)
Patrick Ryan, PhD (Committee Member)
101 p.

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Masterson, E. A. (2012). Prevalence of Workers with Shifts in Hearing by Industry: A Comparison of Occupational Noise Exposure Regulation Criteria [Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1328890418

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Masterson, Elizabeth. Prevalence of Workers with Shifts in Hearing by Industry: A Comparison of Occupational Noise Exposure Regulation Criteria. 2012. University of Cincinnati, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1328890418.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Masterson, Elizabeth. "Prevalence of Workers with Shifts in Hearing by Industry: A Comparison of Occupational Noise Exposure Regulation Criteria." Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, 2012. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1328890418

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)