Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
25772.pdf (3.24 MB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
Facilitators and Barriers to Shared Decision-Making During IEP Meetings
Author Info
Debelak, Amy
ORCID® Identifier
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2907-253X
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1504781569291269
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2017, EdD, University of Cincinnati, Education, Criminal Justice, and Human Services: Special Education.
Abstract
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act requires the parent, the special education teacher, the general education teacher and a district representative to meet the requirements of a full Individual Education Program meeting. However, The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act does not operationally define the roles of each of the Individual Education Program team members. In Doug C. v. Hawaii Board of Education, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit determined parents must play a central role in the Individual Education Program decision-making process. However, when reading the decision, it is challenging not to infer that the court uses the terms attendance and participation interchangeably. This mixed method study explored how Smithville Schools could better improve their policies and procedures to prepare parents from being attendees at Individual Education Program meetings to equal decision-making members of the Individual Education Program team. Phase one of the study surveyed parents of special education students in the district as well as certified staff members of the district who provided services to learners with Individual Education Programs. The survey included statements asking about satisfaction with communication, school and staff relationships, perspectives of the Individual Education Program process, and the bureaucratic nature of Individual Education Program meetings. After data analysis of the survey, the two most satisfied staff members, the two most satisfied parent as well as the two most dissatisfied staff members and the two most dissatisfied parents were invited to participate in a semistructured interview. The interview allowed for parents and staff to share their unique perspectives on facilitators and barriers to shared decision-making to the Individual Education Program process at Smithville Schools.
Committee
Anne Bauer, Ed.D. (Committee Chair)
Amy Farley, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Casey Hord, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Stephen Kroeger, Ed.D. (Committee Member)
Pages
126 p.
Subject Headings
Special Education
Keywords
shared decision-making
;
IEP
;
special education
;
parents
;
staff
;
participation
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Debelak, A. (2017).
Facilitators and Barriers to Shared Decision-Making During IEP Meetings
[Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1504781569291269
APA Style (7th edition)
Debelak, Amy.
Facilitators and Barriers to Shared Decision-Making During IEP Meetings.
2017. University of Cincinnati, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1504781569291269.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Debelak, Amy. "Facilitators and Barriers to Shared Decision-Making During IEP Meetings." Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, 2017. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1504781569291269
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
ucin1504781569291269
Download Count:
268
Copyright Info
© 2017, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by University of Cincinnati and OhioLINK.