Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List

Full text of this paper is not available in the ETD Center. Copies may be available for inter-library loan from University of Cincinnati or may be available for purchase from Proquest/UMI

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

THE EFFECTS OF PROVIDING FEEDBACK REGARDING CLIENT SYMPTOMATOLOGY ON PSYCHOTHERAPY OUTCOME

Galvinhill, Paul Robert
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin992361796

Abstract Details

2001, PhD, University of Cincinnati, Arts and Sciences : Psychology.
This dissertation presents a comparative study of the offertory chant in the Gregorian and Old Roman traditions. Close musical analysis sheds new light on several issues that scholars have long debated. The first is the relative historical position of Gregorian and Old Roman chant. Gregorian and Roman offertories exhibit frequent breaches in continuity, which suggests that both dialects changed during their period of separate transmission. Comparative analysis however, poses a challenge to the view that the Roman tradition more closely preserves the eight-century melodic prototype. The musical evidence is often more compatible with the theory that the surface uniformity of the Roman versions emerged after their separation from the Gregorian. This dissertation also proposes a chronology for the Gregorian offertory cycle. The degree of resemblance between Gregorian and Roman offertories correlates with their placement in the liturgical calendar. Offertories assigned to Advent and Christmas are more consistently related than those of the later liturgical seasons. Moreover, the melodic traits of offertories in each dialect vary according to the liturgical season. These patterns support a theory that the Roman singers began their creation of the offertory with those assigned to Advent and progressed chronologically through the liturgical year, season-by-season. Finally, I consider the relative age of the offertory respond and verse. A majority of Gregorian and Roman responds exhibit points of resemblance indicating that they descend from common melodic prototypes. Verses of the two dialects, however, often show no traces of a common origin, particularly in the later liturgical seasons. The Roman verses exhibit a formulaicism and internal repetition that is lacking in their Gregorian counterparts. Furthermore, the Roman versions reveal a greater dependency on syntactical rules and verbal cues, possibly resulting from their more prolonged period of oral transmission. These differences suggest that verses were melodically unstable at the time of the Frankish reception and subsequently underwent further development in each dialect. I conclude that offertory verses are a comparatively late integration into the melodic tradition. In the final chapter, the conclusions of the musical analysis are substantiated through a reexamination of the texts and liturgical history of the offertory.
A. Norton (Advisor)
Psychology, Clinical
PSYCHOTHERAPY OUTCOME; OUTCOME QUESTIONAIRE

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Galvinhill, P. R. (2001). THE EFFECTS OF PROVIDING FEEDBACK REGARDING CLIENT SYMPTOMATOLOGY ON PSYCHOTHERAPY OUTCOME [Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin992361796

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Galvinhill, Paul. THE EFFECTS OF PROVIDING FEEDBACK REGARDING CLIENT SYMPTOMATOLOGY ON PSYCHOTHERAPY OUTCOME. 2001. University of Cincinnati, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin992361796.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Galvinhill, Paul. "THE EFFECTS OF PROVIDING FEEDBACK REGARDING CLIENT SYMPTOMATOLOGY ON PSYCHOTHERAPY OUTCOME." Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, 2001. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin992361796

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

ucin992361796
© 2001, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by University of Cincinnati and OhioLINK.