Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
FLASH LAG EFFECT MODEL DISCRIMINATION.pdf (1.61 MB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
FLASH LAG EFFECT MODEL DISCRIMINATION
Author Info
Gabbard, Stephen R
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1377024305
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2013, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Wright State University, Human Factors and Industrial/Organizational Psychology PhD.
Abstract
Gabbard, Stephen R., Ph.D., Human Factors and Industrial/Organizational Psychology Ph.D. Program, Department of Psychology, Wright State University, 2013. Flash Lag Effect Model Discrimination The purpose of this study was to test the various models describing the Flash Lag Effect (FLE). Beginning with the initial work of Nijhawan (1994), several models have emerged endeavoring to explain the FLE (e.g., Eagleman & Sejnowski, 2000; Whitney, 2000; Baldo & Caticha, 2005). Two series of studies comprising 11 separate experiments were undertaken to differentiate these models, with a particular focus on the neural network model of Baldo and Caticha (2005). The experiments included the three primary FLE experimental paradigms: continuous motion (CM), flash-initiated (FIC) and flash-terminated (FTC). Ninety-three participants made observations in these three paradigms using a 2-AFC interleaved staircase protocol. ANOVAs were performed on each of the 11 experiments to determine main effects and interactions of the experimental factors, and additionally, overall FLE levels irrespective of factor influences. The combination of results shows that the neural network model (Baldo & Caticha, 2005) holds promise to form the basis for a unifying theory, whereas the postdiction (Eagleman & Sejnowski, 2000) and differential neural latency (Whitney, 2000) models do not. Implications and directions for further study are discussed.
Committee
Scott Watamaniuk, Ph.D. (Committee Chair)
Valerie Shalin, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Alan Nagy, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Robert Patterson, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Pages
159 p.
Subject Headings
Psychology
Keywords
Flash lag effect
;
Neural network model
;
Flash initiated
;
Flash terminated
;
Postdiction
;
Differential neural latency
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Gabbard, S. R. (2013).
FLASH LAG EFFECT MODEL DISCRIMINATION
[Doctoral dissertation, Wright State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1377024305
APA Style (7th edition)
Gabbard, Stephen.
FLASH LAG EFFECT MODEL DISCRIMINATION.
2013. Wright State University, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1377024305.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Gabbard, Stephen. "FLASH LAG EFFECT MODEL DISCRIMINATION." Doctoral dissertation, Wright State University, 2013. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1377024305
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
wright1377024305
Download Count:
513
Copyright Info
© 2013, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Wright State University and OhioLINK.