Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


JacksonSM-Dissertation-2016.pdf (2.43 MB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

The Influence of Implicit and Explicit Gender Bias on Grading, and the Effectiveness of Rubrics for Reducing Bias.

Jackson, Sarah Marie
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0528-5159
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1464731201

Abstract Details

2016, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Wright State University, Human Factors and Industrial/Organizational Psychology PhD.
The effect of implicit bias on discriminatory grading in education has received considerable attention but, to date, no study has examined the effectiveness of using a rubric to reduce biased grading. Current research has demonstrated that the presence of a gender-normative name is sufficient to activate implicit gender bias, which can result in disparate treatment. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of implicit and explicit gender bias on grading decisions for written assignments. When grading identical essays on the topic of computers (stereotypically-male), participants assigned significantly lower grades when the essay was supposedly written by a female author, compared to a male author. This difference was more pronounced in participants who had a stronger implicit association of men with science (high implicit bias). Male and female author grades did not differ when assigned by participants who were low in implicit bias. Further, participants who were high in implicit bias, but reported low explicit prejudice toward women in STEM graded the female author more harshly than the male author. This study also investigated the effectiveness of using a rubric to decrease bias effects on grading. Unexpectedly, use of the rubric enhanced the effect of implicit bias on grading when the author gender and essay topic were stereotype-inconsistent (i.e. female computer author). It is possible that rubric use further depleted cognitive resources already limited by dissonant implicit and explicit attitudes. While rubrics might increase the perception of objectivity, they might also inadvertently serve to amplify the effect of implicit gender bias when the topic being graded is strongly-gender normative.
Tamera Schneider, Ph.D. (Advisor)
Kevin Bennett, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Gary Burns, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Martin Gooden, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
136 p.
Educational Evaluation; Educational Psychology; Gender Studies; Psychology; Social Psychology; Social Research; Womens Studies
implicit bias; gender bias; grades; grading; rubric; explicit attitudes; stereotypes; gender norms; women in STEM; higher education; prejudice; discrimination; sexism; cognitive dissonance

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Jackson, S. M. (2016). The Influence of Implicit and Explicit Gender Bias on Grading, and the Effectiveness of Rubrics for Reducing Bias. [Doctoral dissertation, Wright State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1464731201

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Jackson, Sarah. The Influence of Implicit and Explicit Gender Bias on Grading, and the Effectiveness of Rubrics for Reducing Bias. 2016. Wright State University, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1464731201.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Jackson, Sarah. "The Influence of Implicit and Explicit Gender Bias on Grading, and the Effectiveness of Rubrics for Reducing Bias." Doctoral dissertation, Wright State University, 2016. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1464731201

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

wright1464731201
2,808
© 2016, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Wright State University and OhioLINK.