Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


Hampton Dissertation ETD revised2.pdf (3.46 MB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Symbol Grounding in Social Media Communications

Hampton, Andrew J.
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3644-364X
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1527171552994976

Abstract Details

2018, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Wright State University, Human Factors and Industrial/Organizational Psychology PhD.
Social media data promise to inform the disaster response community, but effective mining remains elusive. To assist in the analysis of community reports on disaster from social media, I draw on an integrated model of psycholinguistic theory to investigate the patterns by which language use changes as a function of environmental influence. Using social media corpora from several disasters and non-disasters, I examine variations in patterns of lexical choice between domain independent paired antonyms with respect to an Internet-specific base rate to determine generic sentinels of breach of canonicity. I examine social media content with respect to disaster proximity and examine relative proportions of actionable content in messages containing words that indicate breach. Results indicate a preliminary set of antonym pairs that vary consistently with respect to breach. Despite the absence of correlation with actionable content density, two related findings support the role of a psycholinguistic perspective on the mining of social media data. First, several diagnostic pairs reflect human function in an environment independent of sentiment. Second, the analysis of sentiment by spatial proximity suggests an increase in positive sentiment with proximity. Both findings motivate the continued study of how human behavior contributes to the production of social media messages, and hence the analysis of the messages they produce. I note several methodological contributions resulting from this work, including the expanded set of informative domain independent lexical items, consideration of base rates that both enables detection of departure from canonicity and reduces reliance on anonymous reporting, and a complement to sentiment analysis that is sensitive to environmental variability. Theoretical contributions include consolidation of disparate threads of language production research (including a focus on grounding). Finally, I identify several limitations in my own analysis, and more general concerns regarding the mining of social media data, to guide future work.
Valerie Shalin, Ph.D. (Committee Chair)
John Flach, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Amit Sheth, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Ion Juvina, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
139 p.
Cognitive Psychology; Psychology
psycholinguistics; lexical choice; breach; disaster response

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Hampton, A. J. (2018). Symbol Grounding in Social Media Communications [Doctoral dissertation, Wright State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1527171552994976

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Hampton, Andrew. Symbol Grounding in Social Media Communications. 2018. Wright State University, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1527171552994976.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Hampton, Andrew. "Symbol Grounding in Social Media Communications." Doctoral dissertation, Wright State University, 2018. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1527171552994976

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

wright1527171552994976
371
© 2018, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Wright State University and OhioLINK.