Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


ysu1296415940.pdf (521.83 KB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Prosecuting Children as Adults: How do Juvenile Court Judges Decide Who Should Face that Fate?

Canale, Laura Ann
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ysu1296415940

Abstract Details

2010, Master of Science in Criminal Justice, Youngstown State University, Department of Criminal Justice.
The increase in juvenile arrests for violent crime over the past several decades has resulted in stricter and harsher legislation regarding juvenile transfer. The legislation has taken much of the discretion away from juvenile court judges, especially with the lowering of the minimum age a juvenile can be transferred to adult criminal court and increasing the amount of crimes that result in automatic transfer. The legislation not only limits the power of judicial discretion, it gives very little to no guidance for juvenile court judges during the transfer process. The effect that the limited guidance has had on the judge's discretionary decision has led to inconsistency in which juveniles are transferred to adult criminal court and which juveniles remain in the juvenile justice system. This study focused on the level of consistency among factors used to determine whether or not to transfer a juvenile, and how certain factors may influence judicial transfer rates. Data were collected from 104 questionnaires completed by juvenile court judges in Ohio and Pennsylvania. The results indicated that there is a level of consistency in how juvenile court judges weigh juvenile transfer factors, but there is less consistency in the offenses judges believe should lead to the transfer process. The results also indicated there is consistency in the juvenile court judges' perception of their discretionary power and in the implications of their discretionary power. Future research studying the effect of geographic regions, residential areas, and judicial experience on the weight juvenile court judges place on factors would benefit this topic. A qualitative study on the responses given by the participants in this study would also benefit the topic.
John Hazy, PhD (Advisor)
Tammy King, PhD (Committee Member)
Christopher Bellas, PhD (Committee Member)
61 p.
Criminology
criminal justice

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Canale, L. A. (2010). Prosecuting Children as Adults: How do Juvenile Court Judges Decide Who Should Face that Fate? [Master's thesis, Youngstown State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ysu1296415940

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Canale, Laura. Prosecuting Children as Adults: How do Juvenile Court Judges Decide Who Should Face that Fate? 2010. Youngstown State University, Master's thesis. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ysu1296415940.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Canale, Laura. "Prosecuting Children as Adults: How do Juvenile Court Judges Decide Who Should Face that Fate?" Master's thesis, Youngstown State University, 2010. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ysu1296415940

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

ysu1296415940
683
© 2010, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Youngstown State University and OhioLINK.