Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


Dissertation_McGraw_ETDv3_complete.pdf (1.3 MB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Reward processing alterations for natural reward in alcohol-preferring (P) rats: Incentive contrast, reward discrimination, and alcohol consumption

McGraw, Justin James
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7707-7300
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1526310548842931

Abstract Details

2018, Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Bowling Green State University, Psychology/Experimental.
Relative reward effects highlight the impact of reward value shifts on goal-directed behavior. A popular method used to examine relative reward effects is incentive contrast. Positive contrast is an upshift or increase in behavior toward a particular outcome due to an alternative comparison, while negative contrast is the opposite. The ability to compare rewards and utilize value shifts to make advantageous outcome decisions may be disrupted in substance use disorders such as alcohol use disorder (AUD). We examined the natural reward comparison abilities of Sprague-Dawley (SD) and alcohol-preferring (P) rats in an operant task using 12 sucrose solution pairings to determine 1) the impact of food restriction on contrast; 2) potential line differences in contrast before P rat alcohol exposure; 3) alcohol effects on contrast in P rats; and 4) the impact of reward value shifts on P rat alcohol intake. Animals underwent a repeated-measures design consisting of two single outcome blocks separated by a mixed outcome block. Appetitive and consummatory measures were used to assess positive and negative contrast toward single outcomes relative to alternatives presented during mixed blocks. Restricted naive P rats show generalization and inverse consummatory contrast as well as impaired relative preference and a lack of reward discrimination. Conversely, they show appetitive contrast and discrimination for sucrose outcomes, suggesting that P rats have enhanced reward seeking but upon consumption abandon their valuation of initial outcomes due to an impaired memory-based reward process which limits contrast and enables them to be hyposensitive to natural reward unlike alcohol. Alcohol had no effect on the absence of contrast in unrestricted P rats. Alcohol intake and preference were altered after incentive contrast tests but due to a lack of contrast, it was unclear whether sucrose upshift or downshift impacted drinking. We conclude that P rats show inherent deficits in reward processing and altered reward comparison abilities which could highlight genetic predispositions in AUD. Food restriction was found to be a key mediator of contrast in SD rats and P rats and analysis of both phases of motivation (appetitive and consummatory) is crucial in examining contrast and reward comparison abilities.
Howard C. Cromwell, PhD (Advisor)
William H. O'Brien, PhD (Committee Member)
Mary-Jon Ludy, PhD (Committee Member)
Lynne E. Hewitt, PhD (Committee Member)
Joshua B. Grubbs, PhD (Committee Member)
192 p.
Experimental Psychology; Neurosciences
Alcohol-preferring rats; incentive contrast; reward; motivation; goal-directed action

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • McGraw, J. J. (2018). Reward processing alterations for natural reward in alcohol-preferring (P) rats: Incentive contrast, reward discrimination, and alcohol consumption [Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1526310548842931

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • McGraw, Justin. Reward processing alterations for natural reward in alcohol-preferring (P) rats: Incentive contrast, reward discrimination, and alcohol consumption. 2018. Bowling Green State University, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1526310548842931.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • McGraw, Justin. "Reward processing alterations for natural reward in alcohol-preferring (P) rats: Incentive contrast, reward discrimination, and alcohol consumption." Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, 2018. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1526310548842931

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

bgsu1526310548842931
360
© 2018, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Bowling Green State University and OhioLINK.