Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
pearce_dissertation.pdf (1.41 MB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
The Stress-Buffering Model of Social Support in Post-Acute Brain Injury Rehabilitation
Author Info
Pearce, Emily Anna
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=antioch1493120784985772
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2016, Psy. D., Antioch University, Antioch New England: Clinical Psychology.
Abstract
Currently, 3.2-5.3 million Americans (1.1-1.7%) live with long-term disability resulting from acquired brain injury (ABI). Despite two to three million more being treated yearly for milder injuries and released without further services, those with enduring problems often require ongoing rehabilitation and support. The immediate and long-term costs of ABI are substantial, as are the burdens associated with lifelong sequelae. A clear understanding of prognostic indicators—only some of which have been identified—could assist in reducing these costs and burdens. Social support, which has been linked with physical health and function in populations across the world, is one likely indicator. Family stress, which may influence the availability of social support and which has been independently linked to functional outcomes in various populations, is another. Somewhat surprisingly, the relationship of either with functional outcomes in ABI has yet to be firmly established. Framed by the Stress-Buffering Model of social support, this study examined the extent to which family stress predicts physical function following ABI and whether and how social support moderates this relationship. Data for this study was obtained from a national brain injury database (OutcomeInfo). OutcomeInfo houses demographic, injury, medical, service, and administrative information, as well as ratings and scores from the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory—Fourth Edition (MPAI-4). The MPAI-4 is a questionnaire designed for use in post-acute rehabilitation and support programs, intended to allow facilities to track outcomes and changes throughout treatment. Bivariate Pearson and partial correlation were used in this study to gather preliminary information about the Stress-Buffering Model’s applicability within these post-acute services. Bivariate Pearson correlations revealed no significant relationships between family stress or friend support and physical function. Partial correlations revealed no significant relationships when controlling for several personal and contextual variables both individually and concurrently. This study had several limitations, and results should not be generalized at this point. Despite the lack of significant results, this study presents a coherent conceptual framework within which to examine these relationships further and provides a research design upon which future investigators may build.
Committee
George Tremblay, PhD (Committee Chair)
William Slammon, PhD (Committee Member)
Nicholas Cioe, PhD (Committee Member)
Pages
131 p.
Subject Headings
Clinical Psychology
Keywords
brain injury
;
rehabilitation
;
outcome
;
family stress
;
social support
;
friend support
;
physical function
;
Stress-Buffering
;
Mayo-Portland
;
MPAI-4
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Pearce, E. A. (2016).
The Stress-Buffering Model of Social Support in Post-Acute Brain Injury Rehabilitation
[Doctoral dissertation, Antioch University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=antioch1493120784985772
APA Style (7th edition)
Pearce, Emily.
The Stress-Buffering Model of Social Support in Post-Acute Brain Injury Rehabilitation .
2016. Antioch University, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=antioch1493120784985772.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Pearce, Emily. "The Stress-Buffering Model of Social Support in Post-Acute Brain Injury Rehabilitation ." Doctoral dissertation, Antioch University, 2016. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=antioch1493120784985772
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
antioch1493120784985772
Download Count:
364
Copyright Info
© 2016, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Antioch University and OhioLINK.