Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Paleoecology of the Lower Devonian Esopus and Carlisle Center Formations (Tristates Group) of New York State

Senglaub, Michael D

Abstract Details

2004, Master of Science (MS), Bowling Green State University, Geology.
The Lower Devonian Esopus and Carlisle Center Formations of New York State are famous for their abundant Zoophycos and lack of other fossils. The goals of this study were to determine the paleoenvironment during the deposition of the Esopus and Carlisle Center Formations, to document any fossils present, and describe any interactions between the trace-makers and other animals. Numerous fossils are actually present in the Esopus and Carlisle Center Formations, including sponges, conulariids, articulate and inarticulate brachiopods, dacryoconarids, ostracodes, conodonts, and fish bones. Associated with some Zoophycos are Chondrites-like burrows. Chondrites trace-makers may have used Zoophycos traces as a food source. Assuming a larger, better-fed, trace-making animal will make larger feeding structures, Zoophycos size may be used as a paleoenvironmental indicator. Measurements were made of 312 Zoophycos web radii and 231 meniscus heights from several localities, and compared to data from the Green Pond Outlier collected by Marintsch and Finks in 1978. Zoophycos from the Carlisle Center Formation are consistently larger than those from the Green Pond Outlier, likely because the Green Pond Outlier represents shallower water than the Carlisle Center Formation. Small (~10cm wide) unbioturbated lenses are described from the Carlisle Center Formation. These lenses have Zoophycos around them but not within them, and contain a concentration of carbonate fossils. The lenses appear to be gutter casts, filled with material transported by storm currents. Calcium phosphate skeletal elements otherwise predominate within the Carlisle Center Formation. It is likely that there is a preservational bias for calcium phosphate and against calcium carbonate, possibly due to the extensive bioturbation in this interval. Since the bioturbators did not enter the gutter casts, the shelly fossils within them were preserved. From the presence of glauconite, Zoophycos, and gutter casts (but no tempestite deposits), a water depth of 60 to 100m can be inferred for the Carlisle Center Formation. The Esopus Formation represents somewhat deeper water. The presence of glauconite and Zoophycos also indicate that the Carlisle Center Formation had a low sedimentation rate, and was slightly dysoxic. The Carlisle Center Formation does contain fossils, although many are likely transported or pelagic in origin.
Margaret Yacobucci (Advisor)
130 p.

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Senglaub, M. D. (2004). Paleoecology of the Lower Devonian Esopus and Carlisle Center Formations (Tristates Group) of New York State [Master's thesis, Bowling Green State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1093022678

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Senglaub, Michael. Paleoecology of the Lower Devonian Esopus and Carlisle Center Formations (Tristates Group) of New York State. 2004. Bowling Green State University, Master's thesis. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1093022678.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Senglaub, Michael. "Paleoecology of the Lower Devonian Esopus and Carlisle Center Formations (Tristates Group) of New York State." Master's thesis, Bowling Green State University, 2004. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1093022678

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)