Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
BGSU_Dissertations_0196_Wruck.pdf (3 MB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
The Relationship Between Speech Sound Discrimination and Oral Stereognosis to Articulation
Author Info
Wruck, Donald K.
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu155593125043655
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
1973, Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Bowling Green State University, Communication Disorders.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to provide additional information concerning the relationship between speech sound discrimination, or auditory feedback, and oral stereognosis, or tactual and kinesthetic feedback, and their influences upon articulation. One hundred and twenty children were divided into two age groups; 6.5 to 8.5 years and l0.5 to l2.5 years. They were further divided into a control and experimental group based upon their performance on the Templin-Darley Articulation Screening Test. Those individuals in the control group had "normal" speech while those in the experimental group had either "mild" or "severe" articulation defects. Tne Goldman-Fristoe-Woodcock Test of Auditory Discrimination was used to assess speech sound discrimination (SSD) performance and the 20 forms standardized by the National Institute of Dental Research were used to assess oral stereognostic (OS) performance. Regarding age level, an analysis of variance (ANOV) revealed: l) no significant difference in SSD performance, between age levels, for either normals or mild articulatory defectives; 2) a significant difference in SSD performance, between age levels, for the severe articulatory defectives; and 3) a significant difference in OS performance, between age levels, at all levels of articulation proficiency. Regarding articulation proficiency for the younger group, the ANOV revealed: l) no significant difference in either SSD or OS performance between the normals and mild articulatory defectives; and 2) a significant difference in both SSD and OD performance between the normal and mild articulatory defective children and the severe articulatory defectives. Regarding the older group's articulation proficiency, the ANOV revealed: l) no significant difference in SSD performance between any of the levels of articulation proficiency; 2) no significant difference in OS performance between the normals and mild articulatory defectives; and 3) a significant difference in OS performance between the normal and mild articulatory defective children and the severe articulatory defectives. The results of this study support the hypothesis that speech production is a servo-system and depending upon the individual's age, relies upon sensory feedback information from the auditory and/or tactual and/or kinesthetic feedĀback systems, and that deficiencies in one or more of these feedback systems may result in articulation defects.
Committee
Bonita Renee Greenberg (Advisor)
Subject Headings
Speech Therapy
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Wruck, D. K. (1973).
The Relationship Between Speech Sound Discrimination and Oral Stereognosis to Articulation
[Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu155593125043655
APA Style (7th edition)
Wruck, Donald.
The Relationship Between Speech Sound Discrimination and Oral Stereognosis to Articulation.
1973. Bowling Green State University, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu155593125043655.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Wruck, Donald. "The Relationship Between Speech Sound Discrimination and Oral Stereognosis to Articulation." Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, 1973. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu155593125043655
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
bgsu155593125043655
Download Count:
102
Copyright Info
This document is provided by Bowling Green State University for research and educational purposes, and may be under copyright by the author or the author's heirs. Please contact the ETD Center administrator at Bowling Green State University
etd@bgsu.edu
with any questions or comments. In your email, be sure to include the URL and title of the specific items you are inquiring about.
This open access ETD is published by Bowling Green State University and OhioLINK.