Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
kent1113327826.pdf (1.48 MB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
Prospective Donors’ Cognitive and Emotive Processing of Charitable Gift Requests
Author Info
Bartolini, William F.
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1113327826
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2005, PHD, Kent State University, College of Communication and Information / School of Communication Studies.
Abstract
Utilizing Ajzen’s (1985) theory of planned behavior as the theoretical basis, prospective donors’ cognitive and emotive processing of requests for charitable gifts was examined. The study extended the model by including emotional involvement operationalized as self-reported strength of discrete emotions. Within a counterbalanced design, subjects (N = 144) watched 3 nonprofit organizations’ fundraising videos and were offered a $15 honorarium, which could be contributed to the organizations as a measure of behavior. Among attitudes toward (a) making a gift, (b) philanthropy, and (c) the organization, only attitude toward the gift (ATT_G) was found to explain a significant portion of behavioral intention (BI). Social and moral norms were found to be components of subjective norms and contributed to behavior intention, whereas descriptive norms did not. Perceived behavioral control also contributed to BI. BI was not related to actual behavior, nor were attitudes or perceived behavioral control. Among the emotions, sadness and puzzlement negatively impacted ATT_G and compassion positively impacted ATT_G. Anger, sadness, and contentment negatively impacted BI and compassion positively affected BI. Higher levels of fear, contentment, happiness, and compassion were related to more positive ATT_G, whereas higher levels of anger and puzzlement were related to less positive ATT_G. Implications for both theory development and professional practice are presented. First, although the TPB effectively predicts intentions to make a charitable gift, the study questions the assumption that positive attitudes or intentions are related to behavior. This study suggests that there are other factors which may impact behavior. Second, this study confirms that people have multiple emotional reactions to altruistic requests, suggesting that research examining the impact of single emotions on persuasive situations may be inadequate. Third, the study suggests that there are cognitions and emotions simultaneously being considered in the decision-making process. For the fundraising professional, these results suggest that development officers should closely monitor prospective donors’ emotional reactions, assess an individual’s attitude toward making a gift, provide information reinforcing that others are making gifts as well as the obligation to assist others, and reinforce the affordability of the gift.
Committee
Rebecca Rubin (Advisor)
Pages
249 p.
Keywords
theory of planned behavior
;
altruism
;
philanthropy
;
charitable requests
;
appraisal theory
;
persuasion
;
influence
;
interpersonal communication
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Bartolini, W. F. (2005).
Prospective Donors’ Cognitive and Emotive Processing of Charitable Gift Requests
[Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1113327826
APA Style (7th edition)
Bartolini, William.
Prospective Donors’ Cognitive and Emotive Processing of Charitable Gift Requests.
2005. Kent State University, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1113327826.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Bartolini, William. "Prospective Donors’ Cognitive and Emotive Processing of Charitable Gift Requests." Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, 2005. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1113327826
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
kent1113327826
Download Count:
1,905
Copyright Info
© 2005, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Kent State University and OhioLINK.
Release 3.2.12